An innovative plan to solve New York City's airport problem


\n If you've ever flown out of New York City, you know that it can be a nightmare actually getting out of Manhattan to the airport -- it doesn't matter if you fly out of LGA, JFK or even EWR. Plus, with all the anti-terrorism measures enacted since 9/11, getting through security and checking in at any of these airports can take much longer than ever expected. With that in mind, New York Magazine recently asked design firm SHoP Architects to suggest a radical design to overhaul New York's three-airport system. One answer might just be the ability to check-in at locations around Manhattan like Union Square (pictured), and then take a dedicated high-speed rail link from there to the airport:


"No one doubts that the city needs a new airport: Our gateways to the sky\nare inconvenient, inefficient vestiges of decades past, their\nweaknesses made all the more apparent by the fact that the transport\nhub at the other end of a flight to or from New York is almost\nalways sleeker and less chaotic than our three-headed monster...


SHoP Architects responded to our\nrequest for a superior fourth-airport proposal with a fascinating\nscheme for solving the space crunch using the ones we already have.\nIt’s a high-speed-rail loop, in which trains would serve both as a\nmeans of conveyance to the airport and, in effect, as the\nairport. In a bold new check-in paradigm, passengers would get their\nboarding passes and go through security at special stations in Union\nSquare and Red Hook (and Astoria and Grand Central and …), then hop on\ntrains that would let them out directly at their plane. Such an\napproach would have the added benefit of reducing the airport space\ndevoted to terminals, making room for more runways. Aviation experts\nwill no doubt find holes to poke here—but this is our future-jet-age\nfantasy, and if Amsterdam can figure out how to put a commuter-rail\ndepot underneath the airport food court, we can certainly get a few\ntrains up and running..."


Anyway, be sure to check out the cool graphics included with the article: (1) The New & Improved JFK and (2) The Inter-Airport, High-Speed Shuttle System.


[image: New York Magazine]


LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Dead – yes, dead – tardigrade found beneath Antarctica

A completely unexpected discovery beneath the ice.

(Goldstein Lab/Wkikpedia/Tigerspaws/Big Think)
Surprising Science
  • Scientists find remains of a tardigrade and crustaceans in a deep, frozen Antarctic lake.
  • The creatures' origin is unknown, and further study is ongoing.
  • Biology speaks up about Antarctica's history.
Keep reading Show less

If you want to spot a narcissist, look at the eyebrows

Bushier eyebrows are associated with higher levels of narcissism, according to new research.

Big Think illustration / Actor Peter Gallagher attends the 24th and final 'A Night at Sardi's' to benefit the Alzheimer's Association at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on March 9, 2016 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)
  • Science has provided an excellent clue for identifying the narcissists among us.
  • Eyebrows are crucial to recognizing identities.
  • The study provides insight into how we process faces and our latent ability to detect toxic people.
Keep reading Show less

Why are women more religious than men? Because men are more willing to take risks.

It's one factor that can help explain the religiosity gap.

Photo credit: Alina Strong on Unsplash
Culture & Religion
  • Sociologists have long observed a gap between the religiosity of men and women.
  • A recent study used data from several national surveys to compare religiosity, risk-taking preferences and demographic information among more than 20,000 American adolescents.
  • The results suggest that risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity.
Keep reading Show less