Your Path Forward Should Include Failure
Originally posted at www.curtrees.com.
Guest post by Curt Rees.
It is important for school leaders to notice the shift that Collins and Halverson (2009) describe; education and learning are taking place more frequently in spheres other than behind the walls of our public schools. Many students are moving to private schools, home school settings, online environments, and private learning centers (like Kaplan and Sylvan). Public education can stay relevant and effective by using the power of technology to customize what students learn (through assessment and instruction), and to also increase the engagement level of learning. Technology can also be an aid to expanding learning because it is able to overcome traditional barriers such as time and location.
More than just remaining relevant, the path forward for school leaders is to enable, encourage, and provoke the type of deep and dynamic learning in staff members that we’d like to see for students. For too long, educators (leaders and teachers) have been cautious in how we go about the task of educating students. We carefully plod along a scripted path, making small adjustments to plans that were thought to be ideal for generations of the past. We seem to keep trying to perfect a system that is no longer relevant, and this isn’t going to cut it anymore. I don't think it is possible for us to tweak our way to greatness.
As leaders, we need to work to establish an environment of experimentation for teachers and students. We should set challenging outcome goals for ourselves and for our students, and then encourage and expect creative and innovative thinking to find solutions that will help meet those goals. We also need to change our fear of failure, because valuable learning lessons can come from that failure. Failure that comes from well-intended effort should be appreciated and praised.
I like Dave Guymon’s thoughts on failure. “If we never fail, it means that what we are doing has already been done or isn’t worth doing in the first place. If we never fail it is because we are comfortable where we are, not moving. If we never fail, it means that we don’t truly want to succeed. That might be fine for you if you are simply here to exist.”
Image credit: Flicker user Miguel Virkkunen Carvalho.
Understanding thinking talents in yourself and others can build strong teams and help avoid burnout.
- Learn to collaborate within a team and identify "thinking talent" surpluses – and shortages.
- Angie McArthur teaches intelligent collaboration for Big Think Edge.
- Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Rediscovering the principles of self-actualisation might be just the tonic that the modern world is crying out for.
Abraham Maslow was the 20th-century American psychologist best-known for explaining motivation through his hierarchy of needs, which he represented in a pyramid. At the base, our physiological needs include food, water, warmth and rest.
"I was so moved when I saw the cells stir," said 90-year-old study co-author Akira Iritani. "I'd been hoping for this for 20 years."
- The team managed to stimulate nucleus-like structures to perform some biological processes, but not cell division.
- Unless better technology and DNA samples emerge in the future, it's unlikely that scientists will be able to clone a woolly mammoth.
- Still, studying the DNA of woolly mammoths provides valuable insights into the genetic adaptations that allowed them to survive in unique environments.
Does believing in true love make people act like jerks?
- Ghosting, or cutting off all contact suddenly with a romantic partner, is not nice.
- Growth-oriented people (who think relationships are made, not born) do not appreciate it.
- Destiny-oriented people (who believe in soulmates) are more likely to be okay with ghosting.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.