The Fourth Era of Financial Markets
Are the financial markets rational? It's a tough claim to make as share prices and bond yields zoom up and down during a single day, hour, or even second, sometimes without any obvious reasons. Yet for the first time in human history, the markets may be approaching the ideal of rationality that economists have long cherished.
Since the very beginning of organized financial markets, bubbles and panics have been a fact of life. In the twentieth century, however, economists decided that people were rational; they made the best decisions possible using all the information available, and they didn't make mistakes systematically. But this theory didn't jive well with the facts. The markets still acted in ways that economic theories couldn't predict.
Enter behavioral finance. For the past two decades or so, researchers working at the nexus of economics and psychology have been able to model the apparently irrational behavior of markets. They've studied why people appear to act against their own interests, become overconfident in their ability to interpret new information, and let the spirit of the mob take over. Not surprisingly, plenty of traders have tried to take advantage of this new modeling to predict ups and downs in the markets. These days, some are even using Twitter and other social media (http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/stocks/2011-05-03-wall-street-traders-mine-tweets_n.htm) to gauge hysteria and use it for arbitrage - buying securities whose value has been depressed by hysteria, or selling those that have been overhyped.
Yet something happens when traders engage in arbitrage on a massive scale: the arbitrage opportunities tend to disappear. The very trades intended to take advantage of the market's mispricing end up setting new prices that better reflect the value of the underlying securities. By trying to exploit hysteria, traders may be doing away with it altogether.
As a result, we are entering the fourth era of financial markets. In the first era, markets fluctuated wildly, but no one knew why. Later, economists claimed to know why but had missed a vital piece of the puzzle. Then they found the missing piece, and its importance was quickly transmitted from the ivory tower to the trading floor. And now, at last, the markets have a chance to become the classically rational stuff of economists' dreams.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.
The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.
A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.
- Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
- The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
- According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
When these companies compete, the people lose.
- When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
- When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
- Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.