State Capitalists Can't Have It Both Ways

The challenge for democracies is to become just as farsighted as the state capitalist systems that have drawn the world's envy. But while we try to bring about this small revolution in our thinking, the state capitalists may be dealing with a much bigger revolution of their own.

With the European Union mired in crisis and the United States struggling to recover, it's easy to conclude that capitalist democracies' engines of economic growth have run out of steam.  While their elected politicians make myopic decisions to score political points, state capitalist leaders like China's build infrastructure and plan for the long term.  Is it time to admit the superiority of a new kind of economic system?

That's the question many economic and political thinkers have been asking in the years since the global financial crisis began, most notably Ian Bremmer in his book, The End of the Free Market.  And they're asking with good reason - with voters going to the polls as often as every two years, politicians in democracies can't seem to focus on anything except winning reelection.  As a result, they neglect the long-term investments that could help their economies to grow; making those investments would incur costs today for benefits that might appear long after the politicians left office.  Meanwhile, leaders of state capitalist countries from Singapore to Saudi Arabia stay in power for a decade or more, carefully guiding their economies through years of stable growth.

These distinctions are fairly obvious, but there's one that's a bit more subtle.  A state capitalist government has zero accountability; unseating it requires a full-on revolution.  By contrast, the frequent elections in democracies offer plenty of accountability.  The problem in democracies is one of preferences.  The voters themselves are shortsighted, so it's no surprise that their leaders are as well. 

If voters rewarded politicians who planned for the long term, then the economic policies of democracies would look very different.  The genius of democracy is that this shift could occur without a costly change in the political system.  Democracies can have it both ways - accountability and farsighted planning - as long as their voters are focused on the long term.

That's not true of state capitalist systems, which will never be accountable to their citizens except in moments of national upheaval.  Such upheavals can be devastating in the short term; they plague economies with uncertainty, reduce investment, and waste resources on unproductive activities like killing people.  In other words, all that long-term planning could go for naught if your system lacks accountability.  There are exceptions, of course: South Korea, Taiwan, and others have managed to shift from state capitalism to democracy in relatively peaceful ways.  Yet for countries like China - where unrest is already manifest - the risk of upheaval remains. 

In the meantime, the challenge for democracies is to become just as farsighted as the state capitalist systems that have drawn the world's envy.  It will be tough - factors ranging from our own narcissism to the increasing complexity of the global economy are making it harder to plan for the future.  But while we try to bring about this small revolution in our thinking, the state capitalists may be dealing with a much bigger revolution of their own.

​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
  • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less

Why the ocean you know and love won’t exist in 50 years

Can sensitive coral reefs survive another human generation?

  • Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them, says author David Wallace-Wells. He posits that without meaningful changes to policies, the trend of them dying out, even in light of recent advances, will continue.
  • The World Wildlife Fund says that 60 percent of all vertebrate mammals have died since just 1970. On top of this, recent studies suggest that insect populations may have fallen by as much as 75 percent over the last few decades.
  • If it were not for our oceans, the planet would probably be already several degrees warmer than it is today due to the emissions we've expelled into the atmosphere.
Keep reading Show less

Why modern men are losing their testosterone

Research has shown that men today have less testosterone than they used to. What's happening?

Flickr user Tom Simpson
Sex & Relationships
  • Several studies have confirmed that testosterone counts in men are lower than what they used to be just a few decades ago.
  • While most men still have perfectly healthy testosterone levels, its reduction puts men at risk for many negative health outcomes.
  • The cause of this drop in testosterone isn't entirely clear, but evidence suggests that it is a multifaceted result of modern, industrialized life.
Keep reading Show less

Health care: Information tech must catch up to medical marvels

Michael Dowling, Northwell Health's CEO, believes we're entering the age of smart medicine.

Photo: Tom Werner / Getty Images
Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • The United States health care system has much room for improvement, and big tech may be laying the foundation for those improvements.
  • Technological progress in medicine is coming from two fronts: medical technology and information technology.
  • As information technology develops, patients will become active participants in their health care, and value-based care may become a reality.
Keep reading Show less