Getting Too Tough on China?
It’s fashionable and easy to blame vast, mysterious, authoritarian China for our economic problems. It’s also not quite fair.
Daniel Altman is Big Think's Chief Economist and an adjunct faculty member at New York University's Stern School of Business. Daniel wrote economic commentary for The Economist, The New York Times, and The International Herald Tribune before founding North Yard Economics, a non-profit consulting firm serving developing countries, in 2008. In between, he served as an economic advisor in the British government and wrote four books, most recently Outrageous Fortunes: The Twelve Surprising Trends That Will Reshape the Global Economy.
In recent weeks members of Congress have again moved to punish China for keeping its currency at a low value relative to the dollar. It’s fashionable and easy to blame vast, mysterious, authoritarian China for our economic problems. It’s also not quite fair. In fact, China’s currency policy offers Americans a very mixed bag.
The cumulative rise in the yuan since the summer of 2005 was about 32 percent – for most countries, a pretty big change. And even though the dollar has been losing ground against a lot of currencies, the yuan’s gains seem to fall within a reasonable range. Over the same period, the British pound lost value, and the euro and the Korean won gained only about 10 percent versus the dollar. At the other end of the spectrum, the Japanese yen and the Swiss franc both rose by roughly 40 percent.
Still, you could argue that the yuan began from a low base, and there’s no doubt that China bought dollars and other currencies by the billion; this helped to keep the value of the yuan lower than what it might otherwise have been. But what was the alternative? China had to do something with the foreign currency that piled up from its trade surpluses, and dollar-denominated assets were a pretty safe bet. Sure, China could have bought other currencies and allowed the yuan to appreciate a bit more against the dollar. Not doing so was a prop to China’s exports, but it was also a sign of confidence in the United States.
In addition, China’s purchases of dollar-denominated securities reduced the cost of borrowing for everyone in the United States, including consumers, by pumping money into American financial markets. What did we buy with these favorable interest rates? Well, yes, a lot of Chinese-made stuff. Yet all the Chinese imports – they amounted to thousands of dollars for every American – raised our living standards. They were cheap relative to manufactured goods from almost anywhere else, so we could afford to buy more stuff and nicer stuff as well.
Plus, what was true for households went double for companies. Inexpensive Chinese raw materials and goods lowered costs for American businesses. Lots of American businesses made money by importing Chinese products for sale to consumers, too.
But what about the issue the politicians talk about the most, the effect on American producers? GettIf the yuan has a low value relative to the dollar, American goods do indeed look very expensive in comparison to Chinese goods. This certainly hurts American companies struggling to compete with Chinese imports and exporters hoping to sell into the Chinese market.
It’s worth looking at exactly where this competition is taking place. Chinese costs in basic manufacturing are so much lower than American costs that the exchange rate is only a small part of the Chinese advantage. Plenty of big American companies have taken advantage of these low costs, too, by starting production in China – a logical way to serve the Chinese market. For things like toys and cars, currency is probably not the major issue.
As China moves up the skills ladder, though, its companies are starting to make products that do compete head-to-head with American output. This is where the real tension lies, and the tension will undoubtedly intensify in the years to come. It just doesn’t mean that the exchange rate issue is a no-brainer. Moving against China is and will always be a choice: to protect jobs in a select but growing group of industries while jeopardizing the cheap imports and loose credit that households have long enjoyed.
Politicians may not care much for these subtleties, especially when attacking China looks like a clear political win. That’s a shame. Given the complexities of the American-Chinese economic relationship, they might want to devote more of their energy to areas that have an unambiguously positive effect on the long-term potential of our economy to compete and grow. (More on them later.)
Image Credit: Gina Sanders/Shutterstock.com
In a breakthrough for nuclear fusion research, scientists at China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) reactor have produced temperatures necessary for nuclear fusion on Earth.
- The EAST reactor was able to heat hydrogen to temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius.
- Nuclear fusion could someday provide the planet with a virtually limitless supply of clean energy.
- Still, scientists have many other obstacles to pass before fusion technology becomes a viable energy source.
Military recruits are supposed to be assessed to see whether they're fit for service. What happens when they're not?
- During the Vietnam War, Robert McNamara began a program called Project 100,000.
- The program brought over 300,000 men to Vietnam who failed to meet minimum criteria for military service, both physically and mentally.
- Project 100,000 recruits were killed in disproportionate numbers and fared worse after their military service than their civilian peers, making the program one of the biggest—and possibly cruelest—mistakes of the Vietnam War.
The 116th Congress is set to break records in term of diversity among its lawmakers, though those changes are coming almost entirely from Democrats.
- Women and nonwhite candidates made record gains in the 2018 midterms.
- In total, almost half of the newly elected Congressional representatives are not white men.
- Those changes come almost entirely from Democrats; Republican members-elect are all white men except for one woman.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.