David Goggins
Former Navy Seal
Career Development
Bryan Cranston
Critical Thinking
Liv Boeree
International Poker Champion
Emotional Intelligence
Amaryllis Fox
Former CIA Clandestine Operative
Chris Hadfield
Retired Canadian Astronaut & Author
from the world's big
Start Learning

Teen Pregnancy Rates and the “Culture of Despair”

When I dropped my daughter and her friends off at their senior prom last week I thought it would be fun to take a walk into the foyer of the building to see all the kids dressed up in their finery. I was surprised when I got there to see, among the finely coiffed girls in pretty dresses and boys looking uncomfortable in their tuxes, a large number of track-pant wearing girls slinging babies on their hips. I asked my daughter later who they were and she explained that the girls in their class with babies had come to the beginning of the prom to see their friends all dressed up for the night.

In Canada, where I live, the birth rate for teenage girls is about 14 per 1,000. Given that there are less than 200 girls in my daughter’s graduating class, statistically there should be less than 3 girls who had babies in their last year of high school. There have been many more than that and a new economics paper might have the explanation for why that has been the case. You see, the kids who attend our local high school come from two very distinct neighborhoods; an affluent well educated neighborhood and a neighborhood referred to as “the pubs”, a place where most of the residents live in public housing and many are on social assistance.

This new research finds, using U.S. data, that much of the state-by-state variations in teen pregnancy rates can be explained by income inequality. They explain that the observation that the rich are much richer than the poor creates a “culture of despair” among less advantaged teens. This culture reduces the perceived cost of child bearing among teens since those girls, probably correctly, assume they will never be able to rise above their current circumstance regardless of their child-bearing. 

The evidence suggests that moving from a high income inequality state to a low income inequality state reduces the probability that a girl with low socio-economic status (defined as having a mother who did not complete high school) will have given birth by age 20 by five percentage points. Interestingly moving from a high income inequality state to a low income inequality state increases the probability of terminating a pregnancy for these same girls by 4.2%. So the main reason for differences in income inequality driving differences in birth rates is not because contraceptive use varies but rather because of abortion rates – girls in high income inequality states are not better at preventing pregnancy but are rather choosing after the fact not to give birth.

There is no effect on the birth rate of high socio-economic status girls moving from a high income inequality state to a low income inequality. This research is not yet published, but is available at the National Bureau of Economic Research. I suspect that by the time it is published though the authors will have been asked by a referee to remove the state of New York from their analysis.  New York State is an outlier in that it has both a very low birth rate and a very high fertility rate – many more girls are getting pregnant in NY but many are choosing to terminate those pregnancies.  It also has, by some measures, the highest level of income inequality among all the US states. I suspect that removing NY though will only strengthen the results of this paper.

One more thing, I really think that part of the effect here comes from the cost of a post-secondary education. If college is inexpensive then even girls from poor families might one day dream of having a college degree. If it is costly, though, then it will be out of the reach of most low income girls, so having a baby in high school won’t affect their probability of going to college (which is already close to zero). Access to post-secondary education also affects income inequality. I suspect that it is this access to education that explains why the child-bearing rate of US teens is three times higher than that of Canadian teens (40 per 1,000 in the US rather than 14 per 1,000 in Canada).

One of my daughter’s friends who I drove to the prom last week was born to an unmarried teen mom who went on to become an engineer so I don’t feel so much despair for the girls that came to see their friends walk the prom red carpet. I suspect what is missing though is someone in their lives to tell them that they have options. This is why it is the culture in which they live that is really to blame for their predicament more than the income inequality. The problem with all these discussions though is that it is difficult to determine which came first – the culture or the inequality.

* Schettini Kearney, Melissa and Phillip B. Levine (2011). “Early Non-Marital Childbearing and the    "Culture of Despair"”  NBER Working Paper 17157

The “new normal” paradox: What COVID-19 has revealed about higher education

Higher education faces challenges that are unlike any other industry. What path will ASU, and universities like ASU, take in a post-COVID world?

Photo: Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images
Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Everywhere you turn, the idea that coronavirus has brought on a "new normal" is present and true. But for higher education, COVID-19 exposes a long list of pernicious old problems more than it presents new problems.
  • It was widely known, yet ignored, that digital instruction must be embraced. When combined with traditional, in-person teaching, it can enhance student learning outcomes at scale.
  • COVID-19 has forced institutions to understand that far too many higher education outcomes are determined by a student's family income, and in the context of COVID-19 this means that lower-income students, first-generation students and students of color will be disproportionately afflicted.
Keep reading Show less

Masturbation boosts your immune system, helping you fight off infection and illness

Can an orgasm a day really keep the doctor away?

Sexual arousal and orgasm increase the number of white blood cells in the body, making it easier to fight infection and illness.

Image by Yurchanka Siarhei on Shutterstock
Sex & Relationships
  • Achieving orgasm through masturbation provides a rush of feel-good hormones (such as dopamine, serotonin and oxytocin) and can re-balance our levels of cortisol (a stress-inducing hormone). This helps our immune system function at a higher level.
  • The surge in "feel-good" hormones also promotes a more relaxed and calm state of being, making it easier to achieve restful sleep, which is a critical part in maintaining a high-functioning immune system.
  • Just as bad habits can slow your immune system, positive habits (such as a healthy sleep schedule and active sex life) can help boost your immune system which can prevent you from becoming sick.
Keep reading Show less

Live on Tuesday | Personal finance in the COVID-19 era

Sallie Krawcheck and Bob Kulhan will be talking money, jobs, and how the pandemic will disproportionally affect women's finances.

How DNA revealed the woolly mammoth's fate – and what it teaches us today

Scientists uncovered the secrets of what drove some of the world's last remaining woolly mammoths to extinction.

Ethan Miller/Getty Images
Surprising Science

Every summer, children on the Alaskan island of St Paul cool down in Lake Hill, a crater lake in an extinct volcano – unaware of the mysteries that lie beneath.

Keep reading Show less
Scroll down to load more…