Diffusion of innovation

Many of you are familiar with Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory, even if you didn't know its formal name. Dr. Everett Rogers is probably most famous for popularizing the following diagram:

[from http://susanlucas.com/it/images/categories.gif]

We often think of this bell curve when we initiate new technology initiatives: Who are the innovators that will jump at this first? When do we start involving folks other than the early adopters? How do we get the rest of the folks (i.e., the late majority and the laggards) on board? And so on...

But Rogers also talked about how the adoption of any innovation (i.e., change) tends to occur in five stages:

  1. awareness,
  2. interest,
  3. evaluation,
  4. trial, and
  5. adoption.
  6. And, importantly, he also discussed what he called perceived characteristics of innovations. These are things considered by potential adopters that affect how likely those potential adopters are to move from awareness to adoption. They are:

    • relative advantage (the 'degree to which an innovation is perceived as being better than the idea it supersedes');
    • compatibility ('the degree to which an innovation is perceived to be consistent with the existing values, past experiences and needs of potential adopters');
    • complexity ('the degree to which an innovation is perceived as difficult to use');
    • trialability ('the opportunity to experiment with the innovation on a limited basis'); and
    • observability ('the degree to which the results of an innovation are visible to others').
    • Innovations that have greater relative advantage, compatibility, trialability, and observability, along with less complexity, generally will be adopted over innovations that do not.

      Numerous school technology initiatives fail to result in widespread changes in educator practice. One prevalent reason is because they did not adequately address the very rational concerns that educators have about one or more of these perceived characteristics of innovations. Anyone who is trying to make wide-scale change happen in their school system must address these sufficiently to alleviate the concerns of the late majority and laggards. Otherwise only the innovators and the early adopters will jump on board, along with some, but not all, of the early majority. I'm sure all of you can think of instances of this and hope you will share some in the comments area.

      LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

      Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

      Getty Images
      Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

      No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

      Keep reading Show less

      4 reasons Martin Luther King, Jr. fought for universal basic income

      In his final years, Martin Luther King, Jr. become increasingly focused on the problem of poverty in America.

      (Photo by J. Wilds/Keystone/Getty Images)
      Politics & Current Affairs
      • Despite being widely known for his leadership role in the American civil rights movement, Martin Luther King, Jr. also played a central role in organizing the Poor People's Campaign of 1968.
      • The campaign was one of the first to demand a guaranteed income for all poor families in America.
      • Today, the idea of a universal basic income is increasingly popular, and King's arguments in support of the policy still make a good case some 50 years later.
      Keep reading Show less

      Why avoiding logical fallacies is an everyday superpower

      10 of the most sandbagging, red-herring, and effective logical fallacies.

      Photo credit: Miguel Henriques on Unsplash
      Personal Growth
      • Many an otherwise-worthwhile argument has been derailed by logical fallacies.
      • Sometimes these fallacies are deliberate tricks, and sometimes just bad reasoning.
      • Avoiding these traps makes disgreeing so much better.
      Keep reading Show less
      • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
      • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
      • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
      Keep reading Show less