I lost one of my principals in our Principal Blogging Project today. I'm not very happy about it. You see, it's your fault.
She was a fabulous blogger. She used her blog to share great things
that were happening in her school. She uploaded photos and graphics to
create student and parent interest. She hyperlinked to helpful
resources. She was a master at using her blog to enhance communication
with parents and build school community. Parents and students loved it.
She was even featured in the newspaper for her blogging efforts.
But then you came to the district. Its new superintendent. The
person who is supposed to lead the way. And you shut her down. Why?
Because of a few negative parent comments on a few blog posts.
You had the chance to do the right thing. You had the chance to hear
your principal tell you about the power of this new communication
medium. You had the chance to find out that every major corporation is
blogging and that there are numerous reasons why administrators should blog.
You had the chance to learn about the technology and the fact that
individual commenters could be blocked or that comments could be turned
off altogether. Sure, some interactivity would be disabled. Sure, some
of the power of blogging would be lost. But at least the principal's
voice could have been preserved.
But you didn't. Instead you had a knee-jerk reaction and shut her
down. Closed her off. Relegated her to the inefficiencies of a listserv
and a paper newsletter.
The irony is that you say on your district web page that you embrace
change. That you value the input of parents and the local community.
That you always want to do what's best for kids. How do you reconcile
shutting down your cutting-edge principal's use of modern communication
tools with your so-called values?
Shame on you. You're supposed to be modeling effective leadership.
You're supposed to be facilitating your building-level leaders' use of
21st century technologies so that teachers and students will be more
likely to use them. You're supposed to be the penultimate "lifelong
learner" in your organization. As someone who prepares superintendents,
I am not impressed.
Congratulations. You've moved your school system one step closer to
the 19th century. I'm sure your parents and community will thank you
for it. May your reign be short.
Sharon Salzberg, world-renowned mindfulness leader, teaches meditation at Big Think Edge.
- Try meditation for the first time with this guided lesson or, if you already practice, enjoy being guided by a world-renowned meditation expert.
- Sharon Salzberg teaches mindfulness meditation for Big Think Edge.
- Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
The 21st century is experiencing an Asianization of politics, business, and culture.
- Our theories about the world, even about history or the geopolitics of the present, tend to be shaped by Anglo perspectives of the Western industrial democracies, particularly those in the United States and the United Kingdom.
- The West, however, is not united. Canada, for instance, acts in many ways that are not in line with American or British policies, particularly in regard to populism. Even if it were united, though, it would not represent most of the world's population.
- European ideas, such as parliamentary democracy and civil service, spread across the world in the 19th century. In the 20th century, American values such as entrepreneurialism went global. In the 21st century, however, what we're seeing now is an Asianization — an Asian confidence that they can determine their own political systems, their own models, and adapt to their own circumstances.
Research has shown that men today have less testosterone than they used to. What's happening?
- Several studies have confirmed that testosterone counts in men are lower than what they used to be just a few decades ago.
- While most men still have perfectly healthy testosterone levels, its reduction puts men at risk for many negative health outcomes.
- The cause of this drop in testosterone isn't entirely clear, but evidence suggests that it is a multifaceted result of modern, industrialized life.
Can sensitive coral reefs survive another human generation?
- Coral reefs may not be able to survive another human decade because of the environmental stress we have placed on them, says author David Wallace-Wells. He posits that without meaningful changes to policies, the trend of them dying out, even in light of recent advances, will continue.
- The World Wildlife Fund says that 60 percent of all vertebrate mammals have died since just 1970. On top of this, recent studies suggest that insect populations may have fallen by as much as 75 percent over the last few decades.
- If it were not for our oceans, the planet would probably be already several degrees warmer than it is today due to the emissions we've expelled into the atmosphere.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.