Why Rachel Held Evans Won't Change Christianity

Why Rachel Held Evans Won't Change Christianity

Some progressive Christian bloggers I respect have been writing enthusiastically about a new book, Rachel Held Evans' A Year of Biblical Womanhood, which they say proves that the Bible has been misused to justify patriarchy and demands for female submission. When the book became a bestseller despite evangelical denunciation, they've seen it as proof that a cultural shift is underway among Christians.


I haven't read the book myself, but I'm not so optimistic. I'd be happy if they were right, but I think patriarchal ideas are much more entrenched in Christianity than they realize, and it's going to take much, much more than one book to undo them. I say so because of another story this month, the Anglican church's shock defeat of a proposal for female bishops:

Those against felt the concept of female bishops could not be reconciled with scripture, and felt that compromise, for that reason, was not a Christian value.

The proposal needed a two-thirds majority in all three houses of the church's General Synod to pass. It met that mark in two houses, but narrowly fell short in the third, the House of Laity. It had been widely expected to pass, and its defeat was described as "disastrous", a "bewildering catastrophe" and a "humiliation" for the outgoing archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams. One commenter said, "I think I have just watched the Church of England commit suicide."

The stunning defeat of female bishops, even in a supposedly liberal mainstream church, shows how deeply rooted within Christianity are ideas of female leadership and female subservience. I think this is something that progressive believers underestimate. It's not just a matter of the "clobber verses" that command women to be silent, but of the fundamental worldview that's woven into the Bible from start to finish.

Consider that, in Christian teaching, God is explicitly male. In fact, he's male twice over - the Father and the Son. Whether you read the book of Genesis metaphorically or literally, either way it says that God created man first and woman to serve him. The Old Testament recounts a continuous lineage of male Israelite kings, except for one queen, Athaliah, who came to power in a bloody coup and reigned only a few years. All the major prophets of the Old Testament were men. Jesus was a man, and he chose twelve men to be his apostles. And all the authors of the Bible's individual books are identified as men.

This kind of sexism is baked into Christianity's origin, which makes it almost impossible to eradicate. If the Bible were a constitution, where you could add amendments, that would be one thing - but it isn't, and you can't. The best you can do is emphasize or reinterpret old stories to give them more woman-friendly messages, but at best this is tinkering around the margins.

None of this can erase the fundamental truth of a biblical worldview where the unquestioned assumption is that men are the prime movers, the leaders, the holders of agency and the makers of decisions, whereas the primary role of women is to gracefully submit, to be obedient and invisible. You can tell the story of Deborah as many times as you want, but this message still comes through loud and clear.

When progressive Christians try to put an egalitarian spin on the Bible, it's the same unconvincing argument made by corporations that claim to not be sexist because their board of directors has nineteen white men and one woman. You can praise that one woman for her leadership skills or recount her brilliant business decisions, but there's still an unmistakable message being sent. And how much more powerful is that message when it's not a corporate board, but the chosen followers of God himself?

Image via The Oncoming Hope

Daylight Atheism: The Book is now available! Click here for reviews and ordering information.

U.S. Navy controls inventions that claim to change "fabric of reality"

Inventions with revolutionary potential made by a mysterious aerospace engineer for the U.S. Navy come to light.

U.S. Navy ships

Credit: Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • U.S. Navy holds patents for enigmatic inventions by aerospace engineer Dr. Salvatore Pais.
  • Pais came up with technology that can "engineer" reality, devising an ultrafast craft, a fusion reactor, and more.
  • While mostly theoretical at this point, the inventions could transform energy, space, and military sectors.
Keep reading Show less

Are we in an AI summer or AI winter?

Neither. We are entering an AI autumn.

Credit: Jesse Chan via Unsplash
13-8
  • The history of AI shows boom periods (AI summers) followed by busts (AI winters).
  • The cyclical nature of AI funding is due to hype and promises not fulfilling expectations.
  • This time, we might enter something resembling an AI autumn rather than an AI winter, but fundamental questions remain if true AI is even possible.
Keep reading Show less

How WallStreetBets “hype” spreads among investors like a virus

A new study explores how investors' behavior is affected by participating in online communities, like Reddit's WallStreetBets.

WallStreetBets reddit page

Rafael Henrique via Adobe Stock
Mind & Brain
  • The study found evidence that "hype" over assets is psychologically contagious among investors in online communities.
  • This hype is self-perpetuating: A small group of investors hypes an asset, bringing in new investors, until growth becomes unsteady and a price crash ensues.
  • The researchers suggested that these new kinds of self-organized, social media-driven investment behaviors are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.
Keep reading Show less
Strange Maps

The ‘Lost Forty’: how a mapping error preserved an old-growth forest

A 19th-century surveying mistake kept lumberjacks away from what is now Minnesota's largest patch of old-growth trees.

Quantcast