Open Thread: New Year's Resolutions
Happy New Year, everyone! As I may have mentioned in the past, I like the tradition of making New Year's resolutions: it's an entirely secular holiday whose point is self-improvement, which is something any atheist ought to be able to get behind. In that spirit, this post is dedicated to New Year's resolutions: whether you kept the ones from last year, and what you resolve to do in the year ahead.
I'll go first: As I mentioned last year, I resolved to keep a food journal in 2011. This one went pretty well - I used MyFitnessPal for Android - and ended up losing about ten pounds, which was what I was aiming at.
I also resolved to be able to run a 5K flat-out, without resting or walking, and I wasn't as successful at that one. My times and top speed have improved a lot, but I still can't do it without stopping to walk at least a little. I think I may be more of a sprinter than an endurance runner, genetically speaking.
And lastly, I resolved to get my book published. I couldn't keep that one in 2011, I admit - but I just might have an announcement to make on that front fairly soon. I'll keep you posted!
As for new resolutions for 2012, I have a couple: I intend to go to the gym at least 144 times (my record for this year was 136), and to increase the maximum weight I can lift in overhead press to 200 pounds (currently at 165) and my bench press to 250 pounds (currently at 200). I'm reassessing the 5K goal and I'm aiming to be able to consistently run one in 30 minutes, which is the single best time I've gotten.
Now it's your turn. What are your resolutions for 2012? And if you made resolutions for 2011, did you keep them?
The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think
The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.
Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.
- Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
- As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
- If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
- Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
- By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
Journalism got a big wake up call in 2016. Can we be optimistic about the future of media?
- "[T]o have a democracy that thrives and actually that manages to stay alive at all, you need regular citizens being able to get good, solid information," says Craig Newmark.
- The only constructive way to deal with fake news? Support trustworthy media. In 2018, Newmark was announced as a major donor of two new media organizations, The City, which will report on New York City-area stories which may have otherwise gone unreported, and The Markup, which will report on technology.
- Greater transparency of fact-checking within media organizations could help confront and correct fake news. Organizations already exist to make media more trustworthy — are we using them? There's The Trust Project, International Fact-Checkers Network, and Tech & Check.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.