Daylight Atheism Is Moving to Patheos

Good morning, everyone! It's a fresh new year, and the winds of change are blowing once again.


This is my last post on Big Think. Effective immediately, Daylight Atheism is moving to Patheos. I'm proud to be the newest member of their fine and growing atheist channel, alongside such superlative writers as Hemant Mehta, JT Eberhard and Libby Anne. And yes, I know that Patheos has lots of religious content as well; so much the better! That just ensures I'll have a never-ending source of fodder to write about.

Just as before, daylightatheism.org will soon redirect to the new site, which will be at the following URL:

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightatheism/

If you're still subscribed to the RSS feed from the original Daylight Atheism, that will also be redirected automatically. If you subscribed to this site's RSS after my move to Big Think, please update your bookmarks with the feed's new address:

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightatheism/feed/

I'd like to thank Big Think for hosting my blog over the past year, and for publishing my first book, which will continue to be available through them. They treated me well, and I'm appreciative of that. But the time has come for me to move on and join a community that's a better fit for my interests and values. Whether you've been a reader all along, or whether you found me here at Big Think, I hope you'll follow me to the new site at Patheos. See you there!

Algorithmic catastrophe: How news feeds reprogram your mind and habits

The most powerful editors in the world? Algorithms.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • According to a Pew Research poll, 45% of U.S. adults get at least some of their news from Facebook, with half of that amount using Facebook as their only news outlet.
  • Algorithms on social media pick what people read. There's worry that social media algorithms are creating filter bubbles, so that they never have to read something they don't agree with and thus cause tribal thinking and confirmation bias.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

Psychological gym experiment proves the power of mind over matter

It isn't mind over matter as much as mind properly working with matter.

DENVER, CO - MAY 16: Brian and Monica Folts workout on treadmills at Colorado Athletic Club Tabor Center on May 16, 2018 in Denver, Colorado. The couple runs marathons and compete in Ironman triathlons and train on on treadmills. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post via Getty Images)
Mind & Brain
  • A new Stanford study finds believing you have genetic predispositions for obesity and low exercise endurance changes your physiology.
  • Participants told they had a protective obesity gene had a better response than those told they did not, even if they did not actually have the gene.
  • Runners performed poorly after learning they did not have the gene for endurance, even if they actually have the gene.
Keep reading Show less

Why this 2015 NASA study is beloved by climate change skeptics

The findings of the controversial study flew in the face of past research on ice gains in Antarctica.

NASA
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A 2015 NASA study caused major controversy by claiming that Antarctica was gaining more ice than it was losing.
  • The study said that ice gains in East Antarctica were effectively canceling out ice losses in the western region of the continent.
  • Since 2015, multiple studies have shown that Antarctica is losing more ice than it's gaining, though the 2015 study remains a favorite of climate change doubters to this day.
Keep reading Show less