We Need Enlightened Regulation
Technology is moving faster than government can keep up. For that, we need enlightened regulation, says David Weild, the former Vice President of NASDAQ and the Founder, Chairman, and CEO of IssuWorks, a company focused on creating technologies to better market securities.
Weild recently spoke at Exponential Finance, presented by Singularity University and CNBC. He pointed to the significant drop in the rate of IPOs every year as a sure sign that regulation is choking needed capital that drives innovation. “It’s interesting because when I was down in Congress I was asked, you know, by the republicans to say that there was too much regulation. And I was asked by the democrats to say that there was too little regulation. What I like to say is that I don’t think that there’s enough enlightened regulation,” Weild explained.
Since the early 1990s, prior to the dot com bubble, there would be an average of 500 IPOs every year, according to Weild. Once the bubble burst, government reacted with regulation that shrunk the annual number of IPOs to around 165.
Weild says that the regulation needs to be reformed: “We did a paper for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, the OECD. We estimated that we should be doing 900 IPOs a year if we hadn’t changed market structure. That was a regulatory shift. So if you think about it all this great technology, but it’s not helping get capital into the hands of entrepreneurs.”
For more on Weild’s insights into how to make regulation more effective so that it allows greater innovation, watch this clip from Big Think’s interview:
How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.
While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.
A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.
We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.
Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.
Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.