Media Sell the Mentally Ill as Violent Criminals. Truth Is, They’re Not.
How many things do you firmly believe because you read it in the papers or saw it on the news?
For this week's Big Thinkers on Mental Health video, we have Columbia University Professor of Clinical Psychiatry Dr. Michael Stone dishing on mental illness as it pertains to violent crime. Dr. Stone, who is also a licensed forensic psychiatrist, makes the point that much of what you probably know about the link between the two stems from what you've read in the papers or seen on the news. After all, nothing sells a Sunday edition quite like "Crazy Person Kills People."
In the video below, Stone argues that this constant barrage of negative news coverage unfairly paints the vast majority of people suffering from mental illness as potential dangers to the public. Truth is, they're not:
As any responsible analyst would do, Stone runs a statistical analysis. Are those diagnosed with schizophrenia more likely to commit violent crimes? Yes, though that's not entirely surprising. Is violent crime among the mentally ill a serious problem? Again, yes. No one wants to downplay that. What's notable though, especially compared to how the media has painted the topic, is just how many people suffering from serious mental illness do not commit violent crimes. As is often the case, a minuscule minority is painting perceptions of the vast majority.
Also of note: the 4-6% of diagnosed schizophrenics who do commit violent crimes are not a random swath of the population. Their bad behavior is more often than not influenced by other variables such as alcohol abuse, which causes the risk of violent crime to skyrocket. Given this information, the typical schizophrenic who is not a substance abuser runs little risk of committing murder, rape, assault, or other similar crimes. Those who do commit violent crimes are often incarcerated in forensic hospitals which, if you've ever read One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, you know are much more difficult to leave than a typical prison.
Stone argues that this general stigma has stemmed from media coverage of tragic events that lacks the necessary nuance to report intelligently about mental illness. The result: fear. In this way, staying away from someone with a severe mental illness for fear of violence is not altogether unlike walking to the other side of the street to avoid walking past an African-American teenager or refusing to fly on a plane with someone wearing a hijab. It's baseless apprehension and cognitive bias. The mentally ill deserve better than to be constantly treated as if they're just one bad day away from violence and murder.
Big Thinkers on Mental Health is a co-production with the Mental Health Channel.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.
The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.
A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.
- Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
- The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
- According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.
- When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
- When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
- Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.