Are Forensic Police Investigations Good Enough for Reality?

On "CSI," it's all too easy: the investigators use hairs, threads, dirt or whatever other minutia they find during evidence collection and tie it to their suspect, all within a tidy hour of television. In reality, however, too many people are sent up the river based on junk science—so says the National Academy of Sciences.


The Academy this week released their Congressionally-mandated report into the state of American forensic sciences. And their conclusions might kick TV-style forensic evidence to the curb, for now. Only nuclear DNA tests have been reliably shown to connect evidence to suspect, the report says. The rest can't be trusted—there are too few peer reviewed studies, too few strong and specific standards for evidence, and too little funding or leadership for the country's forensics labs.

Independence, the report says, is the key for forensic science to improve. The study leaders call for Congress to create a National Institute of Forensic Science to deal with the field's legitimacy problems, and for forensics labs to be independent of law enforcement agencies. The latter, they say, would not only let the scientists set their own budget, but keep them further away from pressure by prosecutors.

Harry T. Edwards, chief judge emeritus of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, says that anything short of total overhaul is not enough. "Not only does the forensic science community lack adequate resources, talent, and mandatory standards; it also lacks the necessary governance structure to address its current weaknesses.  Inefficiencies in the current system cannot be remedied simply by increasing the staff within existing crime laboratories and medical examiner offices."

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

People who engage in fat-shaming tend to score high in this personality trait

A new study explores how certain personality traits affect individuals' attitudes on obesity in others.

Pixabay
Mind & Brain
  • The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
  • The results showed that the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are linked to more negative views and behaviors related to obesity.
  • People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
Keep reading Show less

4 anti-scientific beliefs and their damaging consequences

The rise of anti-scientific thinking and conspiracy is a concerning trend.

Moon Landing Apollo
popular
  • Fifty years later after one of the greatest achievements of mankind, there's a growing number of moon landing deniers. They are part of a larger trend of anti-scientific thinking.
  • Climate change, anti-vaccination and other assorted conspiratorial mindsets are a detriment and show a tangible impediment to fostering real progress or societal change.
  • All of these separate anti-scientific beliefs share a troubling root of intellectual dishonesty and ignorance.
Keep reading Show less

Reigning in brutality - how one man's outrage led to the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions

The history of the Geneva Conventions tells us how the international community draws the line on brutality.

Napoleon III at the Battle of Solferino. Painting by Adolphe Yvon. 1861.
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
  • Four Geneva Conventions defined the rules for prisoners of war, torture, naval and medical personnel and more.
  • Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
Keep reading Show less