An F for vulgarity, an A for free speech

There has been both good commentary and handwringing in the education

blogosphere over the

recent decision in A.B. v. State

(Ind.App.2007). For example, see

the following:

  • Dave
  • Sherman

  • Wesley
  • Fryer

  • Mark
  • van 't Hooft

    For those of you who are interested, here's my comment on Dave Sherman's post:

    Dave, please see

    and my online presentation at

    In the case you cite,

    A.B. v. State (Ind.App.2007), the Greencastle Middle School student

    posted the following message on MySpace:

    Hey you piece of greencastle sh-t. What

    the f-ck do you think of me [now] that you can['t] control me? Huh? Ha ha ha

    guess what I'll wear my f-cking piercings all day long and to school and you

    can['t] do sh-t about it! Ha ha f-cking ha! Stupid bastard! Oh and kudos to

    whomever made this ([I'm] pretty sure I know who). Get a


    Here's what the court said:

    A.B. openly criticizes Gobert's imposed

    school policy on decorative body piercings and forcefully indicates her

    displeasure with it. While we have little regard for A.B.'s use of vulgar

    epithets, we conclude that her overall message constitutes political speech.

    Addressing a state actor, the thrust of A.B.'s expression focuses on explicitly

    opposing Gobert's action in enforcing a certain school policy.


    court also found insufficient harm to result from A.B.'s speech

    the State failed to produce any

    evidence that A.B.'s expression inflicted particularized harm analogous to

    tortuous injury on readily identifiable private interests as required to rebut

    A.B.'s claim of political speech.

    One of the key aspects of libel is

    that you have to prove harm to your reputation. It appears that the court in

    this case viewed this as a student spouting off on a school policy issue, which

    was well within her rights, and found insufficient harm to the principal's

    reputation to warrant a finding of libel.

    Dave, you say that you're

    worried about this happening to you. Is this any different than a post that

    said, "I disagree with Mr. Sherman's policy on piercings? Who does he think he

    is? He can't control me. I'm going to do whatever I want and there's nothing he

    can do about it. I hate you, Mr. Sherman."?

    As you know, you need to

    have a thick skin when you're a principal!

    Finally, I'll close with some quotes. My favorite school law quote of all

    time is the one from the Barnette case:

    • Without debate, without criticism, no administration and no country can

    succeed and no republic can survive. - Pres. John F. Kennedy

  • If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led,
  • like sheep to the slaughter. - Pres. George Washington

  • That [schools] are educating the young for citizenship is reason for
  • scrupulous protection of Constitutional freedoms of the individual, if we are

    not to strangle the free mind at its source and teach youth to discount

    important principles of our government as mere platitudes. - West Virginia

    v. Barnette

  • If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't
  • believe in it at all. - Noam Chomsky

    Compelling speakers do these 4 things every single time

    The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think

    Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee rally at the Anaheim Convention Center on September 8, 2018 in Anaheim, California. (Photo by Barbara Davidson/Getty Images)
    Personal Growth

    The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.

    Keep reading Show less

    Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to good health and well-being

    Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.

    Image courtesy of Pfizer.
    • Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
    • As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
    • If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
    • Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
    • By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
    Keep reading Show less

    Preserving truth: How to confront and correct fake news

    Journalism got a big wake up call in 2016. Can we be optimistic about the future of media?

    • "[T]o have a democracy that thrives and actually that manages to stay alive at all, you need regular citizens being able to get good, solid information," says Craig Newmark.
    • The only constructive way to deal with fake news? Support trustworthy media. In 2018, Newmark was announced as a major donor of two new media organizations, The City, which will report on New York City-area stories which may have otherwise gone unreported, and The Markup, which will report on technology.
    • Greater transparency of fact-checking within media organizations could help confront and correct fake news. Organizations already exist to make media more trustworthy — are we using them? There's The Trust Project, International Fact-Checkers Network, and Tech & Check.
    Keep reading Show less