from the world's big
Environmental Defense Fund Mega-Donor Is Biggest Individual Contributor to Romney Super PAC
Environmental groups and climate activists have been harshly critical of Mitt Romney's unfortunate backtracking on climate science and his commitment to policy action. Much of the criticism has argued that Romney has caved to pressure from GOP donors and activists.
Yet in a strange twist revealed in Federal Election filings, Julian Robertson as the largest individual donor to Mitt Romney's super PAC Restore Our Future ($1.3 million) is also notable for being the biggest mega-donor behind the environmental movement's efforts to pass cap and trade legislation.
As I detailed in last year's Climate Shift report, Robertson, who has a net worth of $2.2 billion, gave the Environmental Defense Fund more than $40 million between 2005 and 2009 to support the group’s efforts to pass cap and trade legislation, accounting for almost one-third of the $144 million that EDF spent on climate change during the period. [These figures are from reporting by former journalist Eric Pooley, who is now VP for communications at EDF.]
To place these sums in context, Robertson's support for EDF is equivalent to the combined total given by Koch-affiliated foundations and ExxonMobil to conservative groups opposing action on climate change during the same period.
Robertson's support for Romney's super PAC is revealed in a front page story at the Washington Post today by Dan Eggan and T.W. Farnum.
Roberston and other super PAC donors are described as "a rarefied group of millionaires and billionaires acting as kingmakers in the GOP contest, often helping to decide, with a simple transfer of money, which candidate might survive another day." As an individual contributor to Restore Our Future, Robertson's $1.3 million ranks only behind the $2.2 million given by companies with ties to cosmetics titan Steven Lund, according to the Post.
If for some climate advocates the influence of money in politics does not give pause, then such advocates can hope that Robertson will use his access and influence with the Romney team to shift the candidate's position on climate change should Romney win the GOP nomination, and especially if he makes it to the White House. Indeed, if Romney does capture the White House, Robertson's position on the Board of Trustees at EDF should give the organization significant access to the Oval Office.
Yet I would argue that big money influence not only in the election but also in the environmental movement itself should be a matter of great concern. As time passes, more information on the strange bedfellow flow of massive funding to the environmental movement in the legislative and policy battle over climate change continues to emerge.
Earlier this month, Bryan Walsh of Time magazine reported that between 2007 and 2010 the Sierra Club accepted over $25 million in donations from Aubrey McClendon, CEO of Chesapeake Energy, a firm heavily involved in natural gas fracking. The money was to support the Sierra Club's battle to close down and limit coal fired power plants, a contribution that Sierra now publicly regrets. For more, see also reporting by Juliet Eilperin at the Washington Post.
UPDATE: In a follow up to this post, the Hill newspaper has reaction from EDF.
“EDF is grateful to Julian Robertson for the support that he has given our organization,” said Eric Pooley, senior vice president for strategy and communications with EDF. He noted that the nonprofit group cannot support individual candidates but that “our supporters are certainly free to.”
UPDATE 2: In another follow up story, Politico's Darren Samuelsohn reports that Robertson has given a total of $60 million to EDF. The article quotes Robertson spokesperson Fraser Seitel:
“The reasons he’s supporting Romney are very simple,” Seitel said. “In his view, Romney is smart enough, moral enough and fit enough to run the country.” “In terms of the environment and climate-change controls, which he does believe is one of the most important issues the country and the world faces, he has confidence that Romney, once he’s in there, will do the right thing,” Seitel added.
Ready to see the future? Nanotronics CEO Matthew Putman talks innovation and the solutions that are right under our noses.
Innovation in manufacturing has crawled since the 1950s. That's about to speed up.
The Fermi paradox asks us where all the aliens are if the cosmos should be filled with them. The Dark Forest theory says we should pray we never find them.
The Milky Way galaxy has 200 billion stars and perhaps 100 billion planets. If even a small fraction of those planets harbored life, and even if only a pathetic scattering of those planets had lifeforms which became intelligent, our galaxy would be teeming with alien civilizations, some of whom would be either looking for us or discoverable for at least a little while.
President Vladimir Putin announces approval of Russia's coronavirus vaccine but scientists warn it may be unsafe.
A new coronavirus vaccine on display at the Nikolai Gamaleya National Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology in Moscow, Russia.
Credit: Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr/ Russian Direct Investment Fund via AP
Medical workers draw blood from volunteers participating in a trial of a coronavirus vaccine at the Budenko Main Military Hospital outside Moscow, Russia.
Credit: Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP
A report from the New York Times raises questions over how the teletherapy startup Talkspace handles user data.
- In the report, several former employees said that "individual users' anonymized conversations were routinely reviewed and mined for insights."
- Talkspace denied using user data for marketing purposes, though it acknowledged that it looks at client transcripts to improve its services.
- It's still unclear whether teletherapy is as effective as traditional therapy.
Talkspace.com<p>Former employees also questioned the legitimacy of certain interventions by the company into client-therapist interactions. For example, after one therapist sent a client a link to an online anxiety worksheet, a company representative instructed her to try to keep clients inside the app.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"I was like, 'How do you know I did that?'" Karissa Brennan, a therapist who worked with Talkspace from 2015 to 2017, told the Times. "They said it was private, but it wasn't."</p><p>Other former employees said the company would pay special attention to its "enterprise partner" clients, who worked at companies like Google. One therapist said Talkspace contacted her for taking too long to respond to Google clients.</p><p>Talkspace responded to the Times with a Medium <a href="https://medium.com/@founders_22883/talkspace-founders-respond-to-a-new-york-times-article-78d6f5c45c59" target="_blank">post</a>, which claimed the Times report contained false and "uninformed assertions."</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"Talkspace is a HIPAA/HITECH and SOC2 approved platform, audited annually by external vendors, and has deployed additional technologies to keep its data safe, exceeding all existing regulatory requirements," the post states.</p>