Argument Culture: Why Atheists Score Higher On Religious Knowledge
Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D. is Associate Professor of Communication Studies, Public Policy, and Urban Affairs at Northeastern University. Nisbet studies the role of communication and advocacy in policymaking and public affairs, focusing on debates over over climate change, energy, and sustainability. Among awards and recognition, Nisbet has been a Visiting Shorenstein Fellow on Press, Politics, and Public Policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, a Health Policy Investigator at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and a Google Science Communication Fellow. In 2011, the editors at the journal Nature recommended Nisbet's research as “essential reading for anyone with a passing interest in the climate change debate,” and the New Republic highlighted his work as a “fascinating dissection of the shortcomings of climate activism."
There's speculation all over the Web today about what seems at first to be an unexpected survey finding from the Pew Research Center: Even after controlling for education, Atheists, agnostics, Jews, and Mormons score higher on quiz like questions of religion-related knowledge than Catholics, mainline Protestants, and Evangelicals.
1) Each of the highest scoring groups is a very small minority in a U.S. culture dominated by other belief traditions. Under these conditions of minority status, there is much higher motivation for members of these groups to seek out, acquire, and retain knowledge about their own beliefs, the beliefs of others, and the legal protections afforded religion.
2) This motivation to acquire and retain knowledge is amplified when these minority individuals also anticipate engaging in conversations or arguments with others--where as a small minority--they often have to defend their own beliefs.
In other words, contrary to some of the claims made today, it's not that atheists are smarter or superior to other groups, but instead, the social climate in the United States encourages and motivates atheists to acquire higher levels of religious knowledge.
For comparison, consider that in past survey studies, Pew has also found that self-identifying Republicans--today a small minority in American politics--score significantly higher on public affairs knowledge than Democrats even after controlling for education, age, and gender.
Consider also that just like the conservative media--where Bill O'Reilly opens every show with talking points for his like-minded audience and Anne Coulter writes books titled "How to Talk to a Liberal If You Must"--atheist pundits provide similar ready-made interpretative handles for their readers and audiences.
Christopher Hitchens' best-seller God Is Not Great is just the latest in a long line of books written for atheists that review chapter by chapter the Bible and other religious texts refuting how the literal claims offered could not possibly be true and the many doctrines from world religions that restrict freedom or various liberties. In these works, just like Republicans highlight Nancy Pelosi, major figures such as Mother Teresa (one of the individuals asked about in the survey), are also demonized.
This heavy focus on "debunking" the arguments of the other side while demonizing historical and contemporary religious figures is also repeated at blogs and in personal conversations. As atheist blogger PZ Myers writes today, reflecting on the survey results: "This is no surprise — we've been aware of this for many years, and one of the things we've routinely experienced is the fact that in arguments, we almost always know more about our opponent's religion than he or she does."
Delay, deny and deflect were the strategies Facebook has used to navigate scandals it's faced in recent years, according to the New York Times.
- The exhaustive report is based on interviews with more than 50 people with ties to the company.
- It outlines how senior executives misled the public and lawmakers in regards to what it had discovered about privacy breaches and Russian interference in U.S. politics.
- On Thursday, Facebook cut ties with one of the companies, Definers Public Relations, listed in the report.
Protected animals are feared to be headed for the black market.
Sure we know it would be bad, but what do all of these scary numbers really mean?
- At the press time, the value was $21.7 trillion dollars.
- Lots of people know that a default would be bad, but not everybody seems to get how horrible it would be.
- While the risk is low, knowing what would happen if a default did occur is important information for all voters.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.