Remnick: Why He Understands Obama, Uniquely
David Remnick appeared on Meet the Press yesterday to discuss his book on Obama. Among other things, he noted how careful the President is in understanding the need for nuance when speaking about race. Care, preparation, and control: without these tools, one ends up with Beer Summits and blogospheric chaos. Exceptional leaders understand themselves, Remnick pointed out; they know their own unknowns. Today’s Times piece on Remnick reminded readers why he is an exceptional leader, and how he manages to maintain control in a not un-Obama-esque way.
The Times reporter notes Remnick’s practice of moving around the New Yorker offices (what MBAs refer to as MBWA, "management by walking around."):
Like [Ben] Bradlee, Mr. Remnick spends his day walking around. "He makes a point of making a circuit around the floor every single day, dropping in on people," said Pamela Maffei McCarthy, deputy editor, "during which he acquires a great deal of information about what’s going on here."
It is part of that shape-shifting quality. "To be an excellent editor, you have to be something of a psychiatrist," said Michael Specter, a staff writer and an old friend. "He’s good at judging the emotional temperament of different writers and what brings out the best in them. With some people, like me, that’s maybe screaming."
With story editing, said the editorial director, Henry Finder, Mr. Remnick often spots "reportorial weaknesses" or when a writer is using "potted history," a clichéd take on a subject. But "if a piece comes in and it’s a successful piece, some editors like to basically spray ‘Kilroy was here’ on everything," Mr. Finder said. "He doesn’t."
Mr. Remnick says he does not like to get in the way of his writers and editors. "I don’t want to muddy the delicate relationship," he says. But he is assiduous about sending thank-you notes to writers, "lovely thank-you notes," Mr. Gladwell said, that make "you feel like you’re a part of something important."
"I have to always remember, writing is really hard," Mr. Remnick said. "I hope that I really respect that."
Remnick is the journalist we want to read on Obama, not only because he’ll write a smart story but because—unlike many who will take on this task—he understands what it means to manage highly intelligent individuals in a uniquely political environment. He knows it is not easy to make it look easy.
Upvote/downvote each of the videos below!
As you vote, keep in mind that we are looking for a winner with the most engaging social venture pitch - an idea you would want to invest in.
- What distinguishes humans is social learning — and teaching.
- Crucial to learning and teaching is the value of free expression.
- And we need political leaders who support environments of social peace and cooperation.
We're talking Ghost in the Shell type of stuff.
Maybe you watched Ghost in the Shell and maybe afterwards you and your friend had a conversation about whether or not you would opt in for some bionic upgrades if that was possible - like a liver that could let you drink unlimitedly or an eye that could give you superhuman vision. And maybe you had differing opinions but you concluded that it's irrelevant because the time to make such choices is far in the future. Well, it turns out, it's two years away.
Tragedy in art, from Ancient Greece to Breaking Bad, resists all our efforts to tie reality up in a neat bow, to draw some edifying lesson from it. Instead it confronts us with our own limitations, leaving us scrabbling in the rubble of certainty to figure out what's next.
- Why democracy has been unpopular with philosophers
- Tragedy's reminder that the past isn't finished with us
- …and why we need art in the first place
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.