'Upstreamism': Your zip code affects your health as much as genetics
Upstreamism advocate Rishi Manchanda calls us to understand health not as a "personal responsibility" but a "common good."
- Upstreamism tasks health care professionals to combat unhealthy social and cultural influences that exist outside — or upstream — of medical facilities.
- Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
- Thankfully, health care professionals are not alone. Upstreamism is increasingly part of our cultural consciousness.
If you encounter the word "miasma" today, it's probably in reference to the worst level of a popular video game. But as late as the 19th century, medical science treated such "bad air" seriously. Under the purview of miasma theory, doctors believed that epidemics of diseases such as cholera and bubonic plague originated from noxious air wafting from decaying, rotting flesh.
Enter John Snow. Mapping an 1854 outbreak of cholera, Snow discovered that the afflicted shared a common environmental link. They all secured water from a pump on Broad Street in Soho, London. Snow theorized it was the water, not the miasmatic air, that caused the outbreak. He removed the pump's handle, nullified the spread of the disease, and proved his theory accurate.
Because of this, Snow is widely considered the father of epidemiology. Michael J. Dowling, president and CEO of Northwell Health, offers an additional honorific. He cites Snow as a "classic upstreamist," one whose example is important to understanding our struggles with upstreamism today.
What is upstreamism?
Upstreamism is a call for health care professionals to recognize that many of the determinants affecting a patient's health exist outside the medical facility — that is, upstream of it.
A clinician can prescribe medicine or offer advice when the patient is in their practice, but consider how much time the average person spends in a hospital and the like. Very little. Instead, the vast majority of a patient's life is spent upstream, in their environment, where many mental and physical health issues can manifest and potentially worsen.
If a health care professional is to be an upstreamist, they must equip themselves to assess and address these social and cultural determinants together with a patient's symptoms.
Rishi Manchanda, founder of HealthBegins and upstreamism advocate, says that "one's zip code matters more than your genetic code." In fact, he points out, epigenetics shows us that our zip codes can shape our genetic codes.
In his TED talk, Manchanda illustrates upstreamism with an anecdote about a patient named Veronica. Veronica suffered chronic, debilitating headaches. She had visited emergency rooms three times before trying Manchanda's clinic. The previous doctors looked at Veronica's symptoms in isolation, saw nothing wrong, and prescribed standard pain medication.
He measured the same vital signs, got the same results, but asked an additional question: what were her living conditions like? Turns out, her living conditions weren't ideal. Her housing had mold, water leaks, and cockroaches. Manchanda theorized that her condition may be the result of an allergic reaction to the mold, a diagnosis the others missed because they only considered Veronica's symptoms in isolation. They forgot to look upstream.
Swimming against the social current?
Volunteers beautify a park in Bowie, MD, as part of a three-year project to repair low-income neighborhoods in the county. (Photo: Staff Sgt. Alexandre Montes/U.S. Air Force)
Like an actual river, a patient's upstream environment doesn't flow in a straight line. In lieu of springs, streams, headwaters, and tributaries, a patient's constitutional watershed contains their social environment, their physical environment, their economic status, their individual lifestyle, and their access to care.
As a result, people living in low-income neighborhoods face far more negative social and cultural health influences than those living in wealthier areas. Patients from such environments are less likely to have access to pollutant-free water, full-service grocery stores and farmers markets, and parks and playgrounds. The stress of such environments leads to higher rates of depression, unresponsive parenting practices, and even increased rates of mortality.
"If you're living in a very, very good neighborhood, […] you will live years longer than the person who lives in a very, very poor area, in general," Dowling said in an interview. "So if I want to improve your health, I've got to make sure that I have doctors, and nurses, etc., to provide medical care to you. But I've also got to figure out how to work on all of these other things."
Mapping the upstream
The challenges of upstreamism would be daunting to health care professionals if they had to face them alone. However, we are in the midst of social changes that will make upstreamism viable. One of those changes is an always connected world where new information is available quickly.
Going back to Veronica's story, Manchanda didn't solve the problem alone. He connected her with a community health worker, and the partnership paid off. The community worker found mold, a strain Veronica was allergic to. Once her home conditions improved, Veronica's quality of life did as well. Manchanda inadvertently helped one of her sons, too, as his asthma was exacerbated by the same mold.
"If we're all able to do this work, doctors and healthcare systems, payers and all of us together, we'll realize something about health. Health is not just a personal responsibility or phenomenon. Health is a common good," Manchanda said in his TED talk.
Beyond search engines, technology companies are making a big push for health care. The tools and innovations they develop could streamline the mapping of a patient's upstream environment. For example, devices like smartphones and Fitbits may allow patients to generate their own health records, offering doctors a proactive, up-to-date account of a patient's environment. The growing ubiquity of such devices will also allow doctors to perform virtual health visits, giving them easy access to patients and their live-in environment.
Finally, many health care professionals and organizations are heeding the upstreamist call to use their voices to advocate for changes to harmful social influences. As part of the Greater New York Hospital Association, Northwell Health has supported actions to curb gun violence in the United States. They advocate for, among other steps, a renewed ban on assault rifles, enhanced background checks, and permitting the CDC and NIH to conduct research on gun violence.
"[G]un violence isn't just a national tragedy, it's also a public health crisis," writes Dowling in his book Health Care Reboot.
This brings us back to John Snow. If he hadn't looked to the environment, looked upstream, he may have missed a solution that saved people's lives. The problems facing upstreamists today may require solutions more taxing than removing a water pump handle. But through technology and changes in social attitudes, they are manageable and can have a lasting impact on health care.
A new Gallup polls shows the rising support for socialism in the United States.
- Socialism is experiencing a boom in support among Americans.
- 43% of Americans now view socialism as "a good thing".
- There are also more people (51%) against socialism as political stances hardened.
Is this proof of a dramatic shift?
- Map details dramatic shift from CNN to Fox News over 10-year period
- Does it show the triumph of "fake news" — or, rather, its defeat?
- A closer look at the map's legend allows for more complex analyses
Dramatic and misleading
Image: Reddit / SICResearch
The situation today: CNN pushed back to the edges of the country.
Over the course of no more than a decade, America has radically switched favorites when it comes to cable news networks. As this sequence of maps showing TMAs (Television Market Areas) suggests, CNN is out, Fox News is in.
The maps are certainly dramatic, but also a bit misleading. They nevertheless provide some insight into the state of journalism and the public's attitudes toward the press in the US.
Let's zoom in:
- It's 2008, on the eve of the Obama Era. CNN (blue) dominates the cable news landscape across America. Fox News (red) is an upstart (°1996) with a few regional bastions in the South.
- By 2010, Fox News has broken out of its southern heartland, colonizing markets in the Midwest and the Northwest — and even northern Maine and southern Alaska.
- Two years later, Fox News has lost those two outliers, but has filled up in the middle: it now boasts two large, contiguous blocks in the southeast and northwest, almost touching.
- In 2014, Fox News seems past its prime. The northwestern block has shrunk, the southeastern one has fragmented.
- Energised by Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, Fox News is back with a vengeance. Not only have Maine and Alaska gone from entirely blue to entirely red, so has most of the rest of the U.S. Fox News has plugged the Nebraska Gap: it's no longer possible to walk from coast to coast across CNN territory.
- By 2018, the fortunes from a decade earlier have almost reversed. Fox News rules the roost. CNN clings on to the Pacific Coast, New Mexico, Minnesota and parts of the Northeast — plus a smattering of metropolitan areas in the South and Midwest.
Image source: Reddit / SICResearch
This sequence of maps, showing America turning from blue to red, elicited strong reactions on the Reddit forum where it was published last week. For some, the takeover by Fox News illustrates the demise of all that's good and fair about news journalism. Among the comments?
- "The end is near."
- "The idiocracy grows."
- "(It's) like a spreading disease."
- "One of the more frightening maps I've seen."
- "LOL that's what happens when you're fake news!"
- "CNN went down the toilet on quality."
- "A Minecraft YouTuber could beat CNN's numbers."
- "CNN has become more like a high-school production of a news show."
Not a few find fault with both channels, even if not always to the same degree:
- "That anybody considers either of those networks good news sources is troubling."
- "Both leave you understanding less rather than more."
- "This is what happens when you spout bullsh-- for two years straight. People find an alternative — even if it's just different bullsh--."
- "CNN is sh-- but it's nowhere close to the outright bullsh-- and baseless propaganda Fox News spews."
"Old people learning to Google"
Image: Google Trends
CNN vs. Fox News search terms (200!-2018)
But what do the maps actually show? Created by SICResearch, they do show a huge evolution, but not of both cable news networks' audience size (i.e. Nielsen ratings). The dramatic shift is one in Google search trends. In other words, it shows how often people type in "CNN" or "Fox News" when surfing the web. And that does not necessarily reflect the relative popularity of both networks. As some commenters suggest:
- "I can't remember the last time that I've searched for a news channel on Google. Is it really that difficult for people to type 'cnn.com'?"
- "More than anything else, these maps show smart phone proliferation (among older people) more than anything else."
- "This is a map of how old people and rural areas have learned to use Google in the last decade."
- "This is basically a map of people who don't understand how the internet works, and it's no surprise that it leans conservative."
A visual image as strong as this map sequence looks designed to elicit a vehement response — and its lack of context offers viewers little new information to challenge their preconceptions. Like the news itself, cartography pretends to be objective, but always has an agenda of its own, even if just by the selection of its topics.
The trick is not to despair of maps (or news) but to get a good sense of the parameters that are in play. And, as is often the case (with both maps and news), what's left out is at least as significant as what's actually shown.
One important point: while Fox News is the sole major purveyor of news and opinion with a conservative/right-wing slant, CNN has more competition in the center/left part of the spectrum, notably from MSNBC.
Another: the average age of cable news viewers — whether they watch CNN or Fox News — is in the mid-60s. As a result of a shift in generational habits, TV viewing is down across the board. Younger people are more comfortable with a "cafeteria" approach to their news menu, selecting alternative and online sources for their information.
It should also be noted, however, that Fox News, according to Harvard's Nieman Lab, dominates Facebook when it comes to engagement among news outlets.
CNN, Fox and MSNBC
Image: Google Trends
CNN vs. Fox (without the 'News'; may include searches for actual foxes). See MSNBC (in yellow) for comparison
For the record, here are the Nielsen ratings for average daily viewer total for the three main cable news networks, for 2018 (compared to 2017):
- Fox News: 1,425,000 (-5%)
- MSNBC: 994,000 (+12%)
- CNN: 706,000 (-9%)
And according to this recent overview, the top 50 of the most popular websites in the U.S. includes cnn.com in 28th place, and foxnews.com in... 27th place.The top 5, in descending order, consists of google.com, youtube.com, facebook.com, amazon.com and yahoo.com — the latter being the highest-placed website in the News and Media category.
Finally, a means for battling the anti-vaccination movement.
- Talking to people who have experienced vaccine-preventable diseases changes minds.
- Seventy percent of Brigham Young University students shifted their vaccine-hesitant stance.
- This research arrives during a year in which 880 measles cases have been identified in America.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.