from the world's big
Split Decision At My House On The Melissa Harris Perry Show
My household has split opinions on the new Melissa Harris-Perry show on MSNBC. I think it is amazing that a national news show has a black woman with braided hair as the anchor of a national political talk show. Then again, maybe I like the show so much because Dr. Perry resembles another doctor friend of mine, sharing her same expressive face and the kind of feisty personality that makes it almost impossible for her to mask her feelings. S., who says she finds it impossible to get over the sound of Dr. Perry’s voice, seems to prefer the perspective of George Stephanopoluous, who hosts This Week on ABC, or the familiarity of the Meet The Press format .
For me, the five white guys around the table scene found week after week on more traditional political shows is unrealistic, artificial, and exclusionary, even if occasionally one or two of the chairs is filled by a woman, or someone who is from a minority group. In the aftermath of the national uproar over the Trayvon Martin killing that became a part of the national conversation last week, David Gregory of Meet The Press hosted Ben Jealous of the NAACP and NPR’s Michelle Norris at a special roundtable on race last Sunday to add a little color to the otherwise all-white panel of guests who are frequent guests on the program.
The Melissa Harris-Perry show on Saturday featured Dr. Perry having a discussion about the very same topic with an array of young male African American teenagers who were approximately the same age as the slain Florida teenager. As you can imagine, these ended up being two very different conversations. Five white guys sitting around a table debating immigration reform should be illegal in 2012. Five white guys sitting around a table arguing over women’s contraception should be aborted in 2012.
What do I like about the Melissa Harris-Perry show? The fact that they let the guests get all their soundbites out and then have to really talk to each other, something that is well suited to a two hour format. The fact that Perry has the gumption to take the abstract out of the discussion from the jump by bringing an actual service worker on to talk about service worker issues, or bringing on an all-Latino panel to talk about Latinos and the Republican Party, is such a simple idea you would think other TV producers would have thought of it by now. What really gets me to even consider sitting down for two hours on a Saturday or Sunday morning to watch Dr. Perry mix it up with politicos and professors is a realization that her sensibilities and her outlook on life as an middle aged African American professional who grew up enjoying both rap music and The Cosby Show are pretty damn close to my own, even at the points where our politics don’t mesh.
What don’t I like? Whoever the damn assistant producer is who is always fucking up the clips she tries to call up should be double fired. How do you get to mess that up more than once on a national TV show? It’s obvious that the producers are cheap as hell – getting guests from places other than NYC, New Jersey, and Washington D.C. is a must. The segments where Dr. Perry tells us what’s on her mind always seem to start out as if they are going to be subversive asides with just the right amount of acerbic wit mixed in, but more often than not, end up sounding like they have been butchered by a censor from the MSNBC executive suite who is afraid to let Dr. Perry push the envelope.
For right now, while the show is in its infancy, I am actually content to watch it just the way it is, because I have confidence that Melissa Harris Perry has the capacity to grow into her role over time.
Ever since we've had the technology, we've looked to the stars in search of alien life. It's assumed that we're looking because we want to find other life in the universe, but what if we're looking to make sure there isn't any?
Here's an equation, and a rather distressing one at that: N = R* × fP × ne × f1 × fi × fc × L. It's the Drake equation, and it describes the number of alien civilizations in our galaxy with whom we might be able to communicate. Its terms correspond to values such as the fraction of stars with planets, the fraction of planets on which life could emerge, the fraction of planets that can support intelligent life, and so on. Using conservative estimates, the minimum result of this equation is 20. There ought to be 20 intelligent alien civilizations in the Milky Way that we can contact and who can contact us. But there aren't any.
Frequent shopping for single items adds to our carbon footprint.
- A new study shows e-commerce sites like Amazon leave larger greenhouse gas footprints than retail stores.
- Ordering online from retail stores has an even smaller footprint than going to the store yourself.
- Greening efforts by major e-commerce sites won't curb wasteful consumer habits. Consolidating online orders can make a difference.
A pile of recycled cardboard sits on the ground at Recology's Recycle Central on January 4, 2018 in San Francisco, California.
Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images<p>A large part of the reason is speed. In a competitive market, pure players use the equation, <em>speed + convenience</em>, to drive adoption. This is especially relevant to the "last mile" GHG footprint: the distance between the distribution center and the consumer.</p><p>Interestingly, the smallest GHG footprint occurs when you order directly from a physical store—even smaller than going there yourself. Pure players, such as Amazon, are the greatest offenders. Variables like geographic location matter; the team looked at shopping in the UK, the US, China, and the Netherlands. </p><p>Sadegh Shahmohammadi, a PhD student at the Netherlands' Radboud University and corresponding author of the paper, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/26/tech/greenhouse-gas-emissions-retail/index.html" target="_blank">says</a> the above "pattern holds true in countries where people mostly drive. It really depends on the country and consumer behavior there."</p><p>The researchers write that this year-and-a-half long study pushes back on previous research that claims online shopping to be better in terms of GHG footprints.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"They have, however, compared the GHG emissions per shopping event and did not consider the link between the retail channels and the basket size, which leads to a different conclusion than that of the current study."</p><p>Online retail is where convenience trumps environment: people tend to order one item at a time when shopping on pure player sites, whereas they stock up on multiple items when visiting a store. Consumers will sometimes order a number of separate items over the course of a week rather than making one trip to purchase everything they need. </p><p>While greening efforts by online retailers are important, until a shift in consumer attitude changes, the current carbon footprint will be a hard obstacle to overcome. Amazon is trying to have it both ways—carbon-free and convenience addicted—and the math isn't adding up. If you need to order things, do it online, but try to consolidate your purchases as much as possible.</p><p>--</p><p><em>Stay in touch with Derek on <a href="http://www.twitter.com/derekberes" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DerekBeresdotcom" target="_blank">Facebook</a> and <a href="https://derekberes.substack.com/" target="_blank">Substack</a>. His next book is</em> "<em>Hero's Dose: The Case For Psychedelics in Ritual and Therapy."</em></p>
Chronic irregular sleep in children was associated with psychotic experiences in adolescence, according to a recent study out of the University of Birmingham's School of Psychology.