Real Conservatives Tout Intangibles While Romney Racks Up Wins

Mitt Romney has run an Obama style campaign with a NASA space launch level of attention to detail. By comparison, most of Romney’s opponents, who insist that they are the “real” conservatives remaining in the field, seem to be organized just well enough to become the student body president at a large state university. The Republican Party’s most prominent members would just about swear to you that they invented the term “survival of the fittest” if you asked them. There is nothing more pure, they are quick to declare, than the ability people have in a capitalistic society to earn what they are worth. So why are Republican Party malcontents so bent out of shape about Mitt Romney’s lead in the GOP presidential nomination race? What is behind this childish infatuation with the idea that a real conservative should be the party’s standard bearer when no one who is considered a real conservative can cut the mustard when it comes to actually winning the Republican presidential nomination?


The media is complicit in this charade, with columnists who are ready and willing to promote the idea that Romney, despite his penchant for planning ahead and being extremely well organized, is somehow lacking when it comes to those intangible qualities they insist the base of the Republican Party have to have in a candidate in order to really get behind him. The media is ready and willing to give Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry and Rick Santorum all the airtime they want to talk about how the Republican Party needs someone who can “beat Obama”, while all three of these guys have the kind of campaigns that are set up to beat Jimmy Carter.

The Democrats ended up with the less electable presidential candidate the last time around too, according to conventional wisdom. But it didn’t happen because of affirmative action. It didn’t happen because white Democrats felt guilty and decided to push the button for the black guy. And it didn’t happen because Barack Obama ran the most attack ads. It happened because Barack Obama’s political operation out strategized, out hustled and out campaigned his opponents. They ran the closest thing to a 50 state campaign to become the Democratic presidential nominee America has ever seen. The Obama organization methodically identified and subsequently energized the largest number of volunteers to a national political campaign in the history of this country. And once they won the nomination, instead of asking the Democratic election establishment to take the reins and provide the bulk of the infrastructure the way past candidates normally have done, the Obama organization supplanted them.

Maybe in 2016 or 2020, if the next Democratic presidential candidate goes back to the way Democratic candidates used to run their presidential campaigns, back when they relied on their personality or the mistakes the Republican candidate might make or a third party candidate to eke out a victory, real conservative candidates who aren’t thoroughly prepared from Day One of their presidential nominee campaigns to run a national race might be relevant. They can charm a few pundits, ear hustle a few voters, and gain access to the levers of the Republican get-out-the-vote machine. But right now, in primary after primary, it appears that the candidate most likely to be the Republican nominee based on actual votes is Mitt Romney.

Related Articles

Scientists discover what caused the worst mass extinction ever

How a cataclysm worse than what killed the dinosaurs destroyed 90 percent of all life on Earth.

Credit: Ron Miller
Surprising Science

While the demise of the dinosaurs gets more attention as far as mass extinctions go, an even more disastrous event called "the Great Dying” or the “End-Permian Extinction” happened on Earth prior to that. Now scientists discovered how this cataclysm, which took place about 250 million years ago, managed to kill off more than 90 percent of all life on the planet.

Keep reading Show less

Why we're so self-critical of ourselves after meeting someone new

A new study discovers the “liking gap” — the difference between how we view others we’re meeting for the first time, and the way we think they’re seeing us.

New acquaintances probably like you more than you think. (Photo by Simone Joyner/Getty Images)
Surprising Science

We tend to be defensive socially. When we meet new people, we’re often concerned with how we’re coming off. Our anxiety causes us to be so concerned with the impression we’re creating that we fail to notice that the same is true of the other person as well. A new study led by Erica J. Boothby, published on September 5 in Psychological Science, reveals how people tend to like us more in first encounters than we’d ever suspect.

Keep reading Show less

NASA launches ICESat-2 into orbit to track ice changes in Antarctica and Greenland

Using advanced laser technology, scientists at NASA will track global changes in ice with greater accuracy.

Firing three pairs of laser beams 10,000 times per second, the ICESat-2 satellite will measure how long it takes for faint reflections to bounce back from ground and sea ice, allowing scientists to measure the thickness, elevation and extent of global ice
popular

Leaving from Vandenberg Air Force base in California this coming Saturday, at 8:46 a.m. ET, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 — or, the "ICESat-2" — is perched atop a United Launch Alliance Delta II rocket, and when it assumes its orbit, it will study ice layers at Earth's poles, using its only payload, the Advance Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS).

Keep reading Show less