United Nations Barcelona Climate Change Talks: Day 2

The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference will fail to create a legally binding commitment that reduces carbon emissions, according to an assessment made by an American climate organization.

BARCELONA — The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference will fail to create a legally binding commitment that reduces carbon emissions, according to an assessment made by an American climate organization attending day two of the United Nations' Barcelona Climate Change Talks.

The dour briefing, given in a beige conference room by members of the Pew Center on Climate Change, seemed to frustrate the many listeners who vocally accused the United States of stonewalling the climate negotiations.

Giving what amounted to an undergraduate civics lecture on American government, the Pew Center explained to its international audience that while American Presidents enjoy substantial domestic and military powers, their authority is vastly more contained when it comes to brokering international agreements.

In other words, blame Congress.

So why does America suffer internal disunity when global cooperation on climate change seems within reach? With the Copenhagen conference just four weeks away, only rapid congressional action could deliver what the world wants from the United States: a binding commitment to reduce carbon emissions.

Given the partisan atmosphere in the House and Senate, however, any immediate passage of substantial climate change legislation would likely come with short-term political costs. And those short-term costs could make more important, long-term emissions goals more difficult to achieve.

(Many attendees of the Climate Change Talks disapprove of how American political concerns appear to trump global ones.

Manik Roy, speaking for the Pew Center, gave five necessary conditions for passing climate change legislation in America.

  • Passage of healthcare reform
  • Steady economic growth
  • A bipartisan spirit
  • Personal leadership from Obama
  • Positive steps by other nations in Copenhagen
  • By all accounts, the Kerry-Graham bill will not reach the Senate floor until well after the Copenhagen ConferenceIt seems the Senators' attempt to lay out their arguments in favor of climate change legislation, coming in the form of an October editorial in The New York Times, was too late to be of real consequence.

    In the meantime, the US is limited to reducing its carbon emissions through the federal Clean Air Act, a set of laws never intended to combat climate change but retrofitted to the emerging issue of greenhouse gases by the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. EPA that they be classified as air pollutants. 

    Our system of checks, balances, and distributed powers—designed to guard against authoritarian influence—can make political progress frustratingly slow. America has rarely bent quickly under international pressure, and climate change is proving no exception.

    As the Copenhagen conference fast approaches, the world is again confronted with that fact.


    LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

    Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

    Getty Images
    Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

    No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

    Keep reading Show less

    People who engage in fat-shaming tend to score high in this personality trait

    A new study explores how certain personality traits affect individuals' attitudes on obesity in others.

    Mind & Brain
    • The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
    • The results showed that the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are linked to more negative views and behaviors related to obesity.
    • People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
    Keep reading Show less

    4 anti-scientific beliefs and their damaging consequences

    The rise of anti-scientific thinking and conspiracy is a concerning trend.

    Moon Landing Apollo
    • Fifty years later after one of the greatest achievements of mankind, there's a growing number of moon landing deniers. They are part of a larger trend of anti-scientific thinking.
    • Climate change, anti-vaccination and other assorted conspiratorial mindsets are a detriment and show a tangible impediment to fostering real progress or societal change.
    • All of these separate anti-scientific beliefs share a troubling root of intellectual dishonesty and ignorance.
    Keep reading Show less

    Reigning in brutality - how one man's outrage led to the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions

    The history of the Geneva Conventions tells us how the international community draws the line on brutality.

    Napoleon III at the Battle of Solferino. Painting by Adolphe Yvon. 1861.
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
    • Four Geneva Conventions defined the rules for prisoners of war, torture, naval and medical personnel and more.
    • Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
    Keep reading Show less