Prized Journalism: The Pulitzer and Payne Awards

Two major journalism prizes were recently announced and the winners say some interesting things about the state of the profession.

The University of Oregon's Payne Award for Ethics in Journalism went to freelance writer Scott Carney and Farnaz Fassihi, Wall Street Journal's deputy bureau chief in the Middle East and Africa. The award recognizes journalists who work "with insight and clarity in the face of political or economic pressures," and this year's winners fit the bill. The judges noted especially Fassihi's coverage of Iran, and one of her thoughtful stories about the country was about the less visible ways the government stifles protest and dissent: by sabotaging protester's academic and professional lives.

Carney's award recognized his Mother Jones story "Meet the Parents," which documents the corruption of the global adoption industry. He focuses on one boy, who was kidnapped from his parents in India and sold to an adoption agency which placed him with a family in the Midwest. But what sets his reporting apart from the herd, in the words of the award's judges, was that Carney "consciously recognized that he was part of the story—in fact, his participation was part of the story." As Carney's reporting proves, reporters are always involved in their subjects in some way, and reporting on this relationship between a journalist and the people with whom they interact can create fruitful new understandings of stories that are often hard to process in more traditional, "objective" formats.

The second big prize announcement this week was of course the Pulitzer. As far as this most established and prestigious of journalistic awards goes, the prizes largely reflected the ongoing demise of smaller newspapers and the ensuing consolidation of reporting capabilities in the hands of major metropolitan papers. The Seattle Times won an award in the breaking local news category, and the paper's position in the community it serves is unfortunately far from unique these days: the Seattle Times' only daily newspaper competitor in the greater Seattle market, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, became an online-only publication around this time last year, leaving Seattle a one-newspaper town. In other categories, the Washington Post won four prizes, in international report, feature writing, criticism and commentary. The New York Times won three, one of which, interestingly, for reporting work conducted in collaboration with the non-profit investigative organization ProPublica.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

10 books to check out from Jordan Peterson's 'Great Books' list

The Canadian professor has an extensive collection posted on his site.

Jordan Peterson with Carl Jung and the cover art of Jaak Panksepp's 'Affective Neuroscience' (Image: Chris Williamson/Getty Images/Big Think)
Personal Growth
  • Peterson's Great Books list features classics by Orwell, Jung, Huxley, and Dostoevsky.
  • Categories include literature, neuroscience, religion, and systems analysis.
  • Having recently left Patreon for "freedom of speech" reasons, Peterson is taking direct donations through Paypal (and Bitcoin).
Keep reading Show less

Radical theory says our universe sits on an inflating bubble in an extra dimension

Cosmologists propose a groundbreaking model of the universe using string theory.

Getty Images/Suvendu Giri
Surprising Science
  • A new paper uses string theory to propose a new model of the universe.
  • The researchers think our universe may be riding a bubble expanded by dark energy.
  • All matter in the universe may exist in strings that reach into another dimension.
Keep reading Show less

Should you invest in China's stock market? Know this one thing first.

Despite incredible economic growth, it is not necessarily an investor's paradise.

  • China's stock market is just 27 years old. It's economy has grown 30x over that time.
  • Imagine if you had invested early and gotten in on the ground floor.
  • Actually, you would have lost money. Here's how that's possible.