Clinton Promises to Foment Foreign Revolutions Via Internet

Now that the dust is settling around the Berlin Wall metaphor which Hillary Clinton made during her major address last Friday on the Internet, let’s have a look at the speech more as a whole. Secretary Clinton also directed human rights criticism toward China which gripped headlines and commentators more than substance of the speech, which was about the potential of the Internet and what direction it is taking us in.

Certainly a topical feature of the Internet, and evidence of the tired claim that it speeds communication, was its role in raising over $25 million via text messages in the United States for victims of the Haitian earthquake. The U.S. State Department coordinated the donation scheme which allowed people to donate a nominal sum of $10 very simply by sending a text.

This is obviously a good use of the internet. Naturally there are more nefarious uses. Secretary Clinton compared the Internet to steel which can be used to build a hospital or a machine gun and to nuclear power which can power a city or destroy it.

At one point in her speech, Secretary Clinton defined a new freedom created by the Internet: the freedom to connect. If people have the right to express themselves freely, which is the idea anyway, then that right naturally must extend to the Internet, a virtual place for virtual speech and virtual assembly. Problem is, such freedom facilitates child porn, identity theft, terrorist communication, and so on. So what’s a nation to do?

Generally, we prefer freedom despite it giving people the opportunity to do stupid, ignorant things. The U.S. apparently prefers it so much that it plans to use the Internet to foment revolution in countries without freedoms like its own. Clinton said:

We are also supporting the development of new tools that enable citizens to exercise their rights of free expression by circumventing politically motivated censorship. We are providing funds to groups around the world to make sure that those tools get to the people who need them in local languages, and with the training they need to access the Internet safely. The United States has been assisting in these efforts for some time, with a focus on implementing these programs as efficiently and effectively as possible. Both the American people and nations that censor the Internet should understand that our government is committed to helping promote Internet freedom.

Clinton was careful to advocate One Internet, a global network without boundaries or borders. Without such a conception of the Internet—even though each country has its own internet webpage suffixes (.com,, .es, .fr and so on) and therefore its own indexing rules determining which information is more available than others—it seems Clinton’s remarks would violate the sovereignty of foreign governments. In a sense, Secretary Clinton envisions the Internet as a place to enact U.S. foreign policy free from bothersome barriers like national boundary lines and the laws that support their existence.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

26 ultra-rich people own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest

The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."

Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
  • In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
  • The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Keep reading Show less

People who constantly complain are harmful to your health

Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.

Photo credit: Getty Images / Stringer

Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.

Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.

Keep reading Show less
  • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
  • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
  • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
Keep reading Show less