It was easy when you knew which writers were writing what in your favorite newspapers. Now, if you’re like the rest of us, you’re constantly combing the internet for fresh information and likely using Google to help you along the way. But how Google finds the information it considers relevant affects not only what you read but what journalists and bloggers write about in their never-ending quest for relevancy and search engine optimized content.
Yesterday I linked to the Columbian Journalism Review for castigating the Huffington Post for its fraudulent article: “Tiger Woods Sex (VIDEO)”. The title was tongue-in-cheek, displaying a video of actual tigers mating in the woods, but it goes to show that writers and news aggregators are changing what they would otherwise say to draw you, the reader, into their site. In a world where the number of hits a website receives determines its viability as a news organization because of its ability to draw funding from advertisers, the general reader represents a tool to be used for profit.
Google uses algorithms to filter search results and has recently “up-graded” to a live search system that indexes Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, etc. While the goal of opening up a wider internet conversation and encouraging participation in it may be achieved, one consequence is that a lot of amateur content and commentary—especially of the 140 character variety—will be included in any given search.
Not only might the reader go by the wayside in a Google-based business model, but the journalist too. Frank Schirrmacher, publisher of the second-largest German newspaper, recently told the Guardian that: “The advertising market today calculates the attention of potential clients in a new way using algorithms. This is ruining journalism. In addition, more and more journalists are writing their headlines not for humans any more, but for Google News.”
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."
- A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
- In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
- The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.
Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.
Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.
- Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
- Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
- But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.