When It's Safe, Out Come the Chicken Crusaders

One of my enduring memories of New York City right after 9/11 was the absence or religious or racial violence. As we stared up at the planeless sky or across the subway cars at nothing, it didn't occur to anyone to avenge the attack by smacking a Muslim or shuttering a mosque. Yet now, after nearly a decade without an al-Qaeda success in this country, a proposed Islamic center has drawn angry demonstrators and political grandstanders. Then, this week, a Muslim cab driver was stabbed on Tuesday and some drunk pissed on the prayer rugs of a Queens mosque on Thursday. Alcohol appears to have played a role in revving up the patriots involved in these two crimes. But alcohol was flowing (freely!) right after 9/11, so the question remains: Why do people in New York feel free to hate on Muslims this summer? Why now, and not then?


My guess is that the absence of a real threat is important to the answer. When we were attacked, the enemy was clearly somewhere else, and clearly very dangerous. No one I knew wanted more people to fight; we had enough to worry about already. Then, too, it was pretty hard, that week, to imagine that the person walking toward you was boiling with inner glee. Differences in dress and language were trumped by the shared experience of being scared, shocked, and bereaved. We were all in the same boat, and worried together that it might sink.

In the absence of a real danger, though, people are more inclined to pick their enemies. They can afford to. For people who are safe, expressing a group identity has ceased to be the obligatory sharing of danger and becomes more like buying a pair of pants. Your anger at people you don't know, on behalf of others you don't know—it's a statement about your self, an image you try on. New Yorkers these days worry much less about who is watching our backs. So perhaps that's why we can indulge ourselves by resenting a keffiyeh or a Bengali accent. Where, after all, are the countries that have banned the burqa? In prosperous and comfortable western Europe, not in countries where Islamic extremists pose an existential threat.

Conventional wisdom is that a terrorist success on American soil would lead to more anti-Islamic incidents like this week's. I don't think so. I think the sight of a real trouble makes people want all the friends they can get.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Dead – yes, dead – tardigrade found beneath Antarctica

A completely unexpected discovery beneath the ice.

(Goldstein Lab/Wkikpedia/Tigerspaws/Big Think)
Surprising Science
  • Scientists find remains of a tardigrade and crustaceans in a deep, frozen Antarctic lake.
  • The creatures' origin is unknown, and further study is ongoing.
  • Biology speaks up about Antarctica's history.
Keep reading Show less

A world map of Virgin Mary apparitions

She met mere mortals with and without the Vatican's approval.

Strange Maps
  • For centuries, the Virgin Mary has appeared to the faithful, requesting devotion and promising comfort.
  • These maps show the geography of Marian apparitions – the handful approved by the Vatican, and many others.
  • Historically, Europe is where most apparitions have been reported, but the U.S. is pretty fertile ground too.
Keep reading Show less

Why are women more religious than men? Because men are more willing to take risks.

It's one factor that can help explain the religiosity gap.

Photo credit: Alina Strong on Unsplash
Culture & Religion
  • Sociologists have long observed a gap between the religiosity of men and women.
  • A recent study used data from several national surveys to compare religiosity, risk-taking preferences and demographic information among more than 20,000 American adolescents.
  • The results suggest that risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity.
Keep reading Show less