Oh, Great: Now There's a Computer That Detects Sarcasm
An Amazon product review with ellipsis ... like this ... and a lot of extra punctuation??!? That is, like, so likely to be sincere. I totally mean that, except that I don't: Those two tics are among telltale signs of hostile irony that, when seen together, allowed a computer algorithm to correctly detect sarcasm in more than three-quarters of the examples it analyzed—as described in this paper (pdf).
Before you say "like I care," know that the paper, by Oren Tsur, Dmitry Davidof and Ari Rappoport, is a breakthrough in artificial intelligence. Because sarcasm has always been, you know, so easy for computers to grasp. How are they supposed to "get" when the explicit meaning of an utterance is actually the opposite of what the speaker intended? On every level—social setting, meaning, grammar, intonation—sarcasm demands so much mental processing and detailed knowledge that even people have a tough time with it. (A couple of different new punctuation marks, one of which is the thumbnail illustration for this post, have been proposed to help them.) No wonder some experts were surprised that an artificial intelligence could attain even a 75-percent-correct score for sarcastic phrases.
As reported in The Jerusalem Post, three authors' SASI, or "Semi-supervised Algorithm for Sarcasm Identification," is trained to recognize patterns that are linked to sarcastic meaning (like "...", excess punctuation marks (!*?!!), lots of CAPITAL LETTERS for emphasis, and the use of certain key phrases like "I guess" (as in "I guess I'm naive: I didn't think we needed computers to figure this out"). Alone, each indicator isn't a very good predictor, but when they occur together, then, like duh—sarcasm's likely in the air.
The researchers developed their taxonomy, and their training examples, from a collection of 66,000 product reviews on Amazon.com. The experience led them to some interesting conclusions about what provokes sarcasm. If a product is much-hyped, expensive and simple, they say, reviews are much more likely to be snarky. Presumably that's because heavy advertising and a high price make people outraged, while a simple function makes it easier to tell if a product is a failure—and easier to sneer at ("Silly me, the Kindle and the Sony eBook can't read these protected formats. Great!").
Step inside the unlikely friendship of a former ACLU president and an ultra-conservative Supreme Court Justice.
- Former president of the ACLU Nadine Strossen and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia were unlikely friends. They debated each other at events all over the world, and because of that developed a deep and rewarding friendship – despite their immense differences.
- Scalia, a famous conservative, was invited to circles that were not his "home territory", such as the ACLU, to debate his views. Here, Strossen expresses her gratitude and respect for his commitment to the exchange of ideas.
- "It's really sad that people seem to think that if you disagree with somebody on some issues you can't be mutually respectful, you can't enjoy each other's company, you can't learn from each other and grow in yourself," says Strossen.
- The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Learn how to redesign your job for maximum reward.
- Broaching the question "What is my purpose?" is daunting – it's a grandiose idea, but research can make it a little more approachable if work is where you find your meaning. It turns out you can redesign your job to have maximum purpose.
- There are 3 ways people find meaning at work, what Aaron Hurst calls the three elevations of impact. About a third of the population finds meaning at an individual level, from seeing the direct impact of their work on other people. Another third of people find their purpose at an organizational level. And the last third of people find meaning at a social level.
- "What's interesting about these three elevations of impact is they enable us to find meaning in any job if we approach it the right way. And it shows how accessible purpose can be when we take responsibility for it in our work," says Hurst.
Erik Verlinde has been compared to Einstein for completely rethinking the nature of gravity.
- The Dutch physicist Erik Verlinde's hypothesis describes gravity as an "emergent" force not fundamental.
- The scientist thinks his ideas describe the universe better than existing models, without resorting to "dark matter".
- While some question his previous papers, Verlinde is reworking his ideas as a full-fledged theory.
TuSimple, an autonomous trucking company, has also engaged in test programs with the United States Postal Service and Amazon.
PAUL RATJE / Contributor
- This week, UPS announced that it's working with autonomous trucking startup TuSimple on a pilot project to deliver cargo in Arizona using self-driving trucks.
- UPS has also acquired a minority stake in TuSimple.
- TuSimple hopes its trucks will be fully autonomous — without a human driver — by late 2020, though regulatory questions remain.