C’mon Get Happy: Buy Time, Not Stuff

A new study conducted at Cornell University suggests that spending money on experiences (family vacation, massage, guitar lesson) rather than stuff (new flat screen TV, iPhone, set of china) actually can make consumers happier. A line graph would look like this: happiness resulting from spending on experiences increases over time, while happiness resulting from spending on things plummets over time, and can actually make a person less happy than they were to start.

One of the reasons for this phenomenon is that it’s easier, for example, for me to try to quantify and compare my level of enjoyment of a new TV to your level of enjoyment of your new TV than it is for me to compare the value I get out of a family vacation to what you got out of yours. Experiences are by nature unique – that’s where much of their value lies – whereas one can always agonize over other, better TV deals that might have been had. People are more likely to make quick, confident decisions about how to spend on experiences than on stuff - and more likely to be increasingly happy about those decisions over time.

At first glance, this seems like a sustainable notion – I’ll get more out of a self-fueled hike (or guided bird watching tour) than a natural resource and carbon-heavy new computer – but is it really? What if I fly from New York to Colorado for the hike? What if my idea of a great family vacation is Disney Land? Perhaps the study’s eco-takeaway is that we could all stand to take greater notice of that place on the spending spectrum where low-carbon and experience-buys overlap – a hike closer to home, a local music concert, a picnic in the park. Who knows, we might even wind up happier for it.

It feels a bit anti-American right now to suggest buying less stuff – goodness knows our government has tried to jump-start the stalled consumers in us all – but a simple walk in the woods could be just what the doctor ordered.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Top Video Splash
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.