So Who Benefitted From Gadaffi's Largesse?

AS the United Nations Security Council meets in New York, Secretary General Ban ki moon is calling for “decisive” action to be taken against the Libyan regime. The UN Secretary General deserves all of the support he can get, and is absolutely right to call for tough sanctions and for Gadaffi and his henchmen to face charges of crimes against humanity. We shall see if Permanent Members, China and Russia go along with the UN consensus, or simply abstain. To vote against the Security Council resolution would set both countries against the Pale of international opinion.


We must surely hope that the global reaction to Gadaffi’s slaughter of his own people is such that he cannot survive much longer in his Tripoli fastness. How risible seem his ludicrous claims now that the uprising is the property of drugged youth – or of Al Qaeda! But then it wasn’t that long ago that some political leaders in the West really did believe that Gadaffi had become a bulwark against Islamic fundamentalism, which goes part of the way to explain how it was the Britain in particular began to sell arms to Libya again.

This we were told was ‘real politic’, but how ghastly it all seems now. To an extent, there was a time when I could understand why Libya was being brought in from the cold, although having reported from that country and interviewed Libyan dissidents; I imagined that we would be supping with Gadaffi from a very long spoon.

I began to wonder about the policy as Gadaffi’s son Saif al-Islam was being so assiduously courted, in particular by Western politicians such as Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson. I also began to wonder as the deal to release convicted Lockerbie bomber, al Megrahi began to unravel – not because I believed al Megrahi was guilty, but because there was such an obvious political narrative to the whole affair. Saif al-Islam, according to Libyan dissidents was just as much a thug as his father. The only difference being that he wore a tie and periodically showered money on various Western pet projects, including one organised by the London School of Economics.

In recent days, Saif al-islam has tried to cash in on that friendship with Blair, by asking him to intervene to save his father's regime.

Said al-Islam revealed his true colours in a long winded, frankly barmy speech that verged on the schizophrenic earlier in the week. The man that Gadaffi and some Western leaders wanted and expected to succeed was revealed to be every bit as a brutal as his father.

If and when the Gadaffi clan to appear in front of a court in The Hague, my earnest hope is that the prosecution will also follow the money.  Who benefitted from Gadaffi’s largesse and why? Was Western policy influenced by Gadaffi’s largesse? And, did any Libyan money find its way into any projects supported by Tony Blair’s Foundation or business interests?

Befriend your ideological opposite. It’s fun.

Step inside the unlikely friendship of a former ACLU president and an ultra-conservative Supreme Court Justice.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Former president of the ACLU Nadine Strossen and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia were unlikely friends. They debated each other at events all over the world, and because of that developed a deep and rewarding friendship – despite their immense differences.
  • Scalia, a famous conservative, was invited to circles that were not his "home territory", such as the ACLU, to debate his views. Here, Strossen expresses her gratitude and respect for his commitment to the exchange of ideas.
  • "It's really sad that people seem to think that if you disagree with somebody on some issues you can't be mutually respectful, you can't enjoy each other's company, you can't learn from each other and grow in yourself," says Strossen.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

3 ways to find a meaningful job, or find purpose in the job you already have

Learn how to redesign your job for maximum reward.

Videos
  • Broaching the question "What is my purpose?" is daunting – it's a grandiose idea, but research can make it a little more approachable if work is where you find your meaning. It turns out you can redesign your job to have maximum purpose.
  • There are 3 ways people find meaning at work, what Aaron Hurst calls the three elevations of impact. About a third of the population finds meaning at an individual level, from seeing the direct impact of their work on other people. Another third of people find their purpose at an organizational level. And the last third of people find meaning at a social level.
  • "What's interesting about these three elevations of impact is they enable us to find meaning in any job if we approach it the right way. And it shows how accessible purpose can be when we take responsibility for it in our work," says Hurst.
Keep reading Show less

Physicist advances a radical theory of gravity

Erik Verlinde has been compared to Einstein for completely rethinking the nature of gravity.

Photo by Willeke Duijvekam
Surprising Science
  • The Dutch physicist Erik Verlinde's hypothesis describes gravity as an "emergent" force not fundamental.
  • The scientist thinks his ideas describe the universe better than existing models, without resorting to "dark matter".
  • While some question his previous papers, Verlinde is reworking his ideas as a full-fledged theory.
Keep reading Show less

UPS has been discreetly using self-driving trucks to deliver cargo

TuSimple, an autonomous trucking company, has also engaged in test programs with the United States Postal Service and Amazon.


PAUL RATJE / Contributor
Technology & Innovation
  • This week, UPS announced that it's working with autonomous trucking startup TuSimple on a pilot project to deliver cargo in Arizona using self-driving trucks.
  • UPS has also acquired a minority stake in TuSimple.
  • TuSimple hopes its trucks will be fully autonomous — without a human driver — by late 2020, though regulatory questions remain.
Keep reading Show less