Maldives: A Moderate Islamic State or a Taliban State?
The dramatic decision by the Maldives Government to close down tourist hotel health spas – following recent noisy protests that claimed they were ‘un Islamic’ - provoked fairly predictable headlines in some of the Western media. Best was the tongue in cheek concern in the London Evening Standard that multi millionaire British heiress, Tamara Ecclestone, might have to alter her travel plans, having trilled on at length in glossy magazines about her planned holiday massages in Maldivian tourist resorts. Unsurprisingly perhaps, there was rather more to the spa banning story than the flurry of excitable newspaper headlines might have suggested. For no sooner had the order to close the spas been made, it was then rescinded by the Government.
The ultimate decision was then passed on to the Supreme Court for final adjudication. The Maldivian tourism industry heaved a collective sigh of relief, and the Maldives President, Mohammed Nasheed, closed his office door for the evening, quietly confident that he might just have won an almighty PR victory over some of his conservative opponents. Next year, 2013, is election year and barring economic calamity over the next few months, opponents of the President appeared to have played most of their big cards.
For the Maldives, a scattered archipelago of over a thousand islands, two hundred of which are inhabited, in the Middle of the Indian Ocean, and home to 313,920 people, now stands at the cross roads. Should the island State, which gained its independence from Britain in 1965 retain its 800 year old allegiance to a fairly liberal blend of Sufi and Sunni Islam, or should it resist the encroachment of what some in the country see as a Western decadence, and adopt a stricter interpretation of the Islamic faith? “This”, says a supporter of President Nasheed “is now a struggle between different visions of the Maldives. Bluntly, do we want a moderate Islamic State or a Taliban State?”
On Wednesday, it had been expected that the Supreme Court might be forced to make some kind of official and ground breaking declaration as to exactly what tenets of Islam were appropriate to the Maldives. But at the eleventh hour, the court edged back from its own massive leap of faith. This decision, has for the time being at least, been put on hold. It had all looked very different back at the end of December. Then President Nasheed and his supporters were beginning to feel embattled, surrounded by an ever noisier and more confident political opposition, that Nasheed believed had deliberately joined forces with religious conservatives in order to bring him down. And then the UN Human Rights Commissioner, Navi Pillay came to town. She used her speech to the Maldivian Parliament to deliver an unusually blunt message to those who would bring Sharia Law to the Maldives, declaring that elements of it conflicted with human rights. It was a brave speech, but one in retrospect the President and his supporters would probably rather she had delivered somewhere else during her visit. For it provoked a storm of protest with Opposition supporters noisily demonstrating with placards that declared ‘Down with the UN!’ and ‘Pillay Go Home!’
Despite being divided amongst themselves the Opposition parties still hold a majority of seats in the Majlis, and Pillay’s speech provided an opportunity to turn up the heat of bubbling resentment against President Nasheed’s Government amongst conservative religious groupings. Opposition leaders, including the octogenarian former President Gayoom, who maintained absolute rule for over thirty years, had thrown their weight behind a small number of religious leaders demanding the imposition of Sharia Law, and the banning of health and massage spas, as well as the sale of alcohol and pork to tourists. The spas are seen by some as little more than upmarket brothels. Joining him were representatives of the Adhaalath, or ‘Justice Party’, which gained around four per cent of the popular vote in the last elections.
On December 23rd a disparate group of conservative organisations organized a noisy rally of some four to five thousand people in the islands crowded capital of Male. This was widely billed by some of the President’s opponents as the Maldives ‘Tahir Square’ moment, when ordinary Maldivians would demonstrate their anger and disgust at a Government they accused of seeking to “wipe out the faith of the people by subterfuge”.
Prominent at the protest rally, and wearing a bandana which boldly declared ‘Defend Islam!’ was Gasim Ibrahim, the head of another Opposition party, the ‘Jumhorree’ or Republican Party. Coincidentally, Ibrahim is the multi millionaire owner of some of the Maldives hottest tourist destinations, which offer both alcohol and health spas to the tourists who come flocking to the islands paradise. A former Presidential candidate, Ibrahim is reputedly the Maldives wealthiest man and owns the Villa Group, the largest company in the Maldives. In 2009, he was arrested on charges of ‘corruption, but was later released without charge. An alternative rally organized by supporters of the President over the next couple of days managed to pull together around half the number of those who attended the Opposition protest rally. Nonetheless, Nasheed is confident that an overwhelming majority of Maldivians would much prefer existing Islamic practices and norms. “What I want is a tolerant form of Islam”, he told The National. “I am absolutely convinced that a majority of our citizens want to continue with our traditional form of Islam. We really won’t be able to achieve development by going back to the Stone Age. His speech at his own rally was rather more direct; “Should we ban music? Should we mutilate girls’ genitals? Should we allow nine year old girls to be married? Should we forbid drawing? Is this really nation building?
By acquiescing to one of the protestors demands – to close down hotel spas and massage parlours on the grounds that they are un-Islamic – Nasheed effectively, forced some of his political opponents such as Gasim Ibrahim to choose between their business interests and religion. “Theirs was an unholy alliance”, says a Nasheed supporter “and they have opted for their businesses”. While opponents of the President say that their demands have been deliberately distorted. “We are quite capable of distinguishing between health spas in tourist resorts and brothels in Male”, says one who protested in the capital back in December. And this may go to the crux of a deeper problem that does feed resentment – the segregation of the wealthy tourist resorts from local people. One of the President’s long time supporters and friends from his days in exile in Britain, David Hardingham says; “Many of the locals seldom mix with tourists, living Worlds apart – although I know the Government really wants to broaden the economic benefits to Maldivians and reduce the impact of extremism”.
Others lay the blame on recent protests partially at the door of Islamic preachers from overseas, who have recently visited the islands, and at the foreign funding of the more conservative religious schools. That said the political bid to harness a conservative religious base that probably at best amount to around ten per cent of the population appears to have backfired – for the moment at least. And something else is happening too. Open discussion of religion, long something of a taboo subject amongst Maldivians, is now taking place wherever people are gathered together.
What can 3D printing do for medicine? The "sky is the limit," says Northwell Health researcher Dr. Todd Goldstein.
- Medical professionals are currently using 3D printers to create prosthetics and patient-specific organ models that doctors can use to prepare for surgery.
- Eventually, scientists hope to print patient-specific organs that can be transplanted safely into the human body.
- Northwell Health, New York State's largest health care provider, is pioneering 3D printing in medicine in three key ways.
A recent study gives new meaning to the saying "fake it 'til you make it."
- The study involves four experiments that measured individuals' socioeconomic status, overconfidence and actual performance.
- Results consistently showed that high-class people tend to overestimate their abilities.
- However, this overconfidence was misinterpreted as genuine competence in one study, suggesting overestimating your abilities can have social advantages.
Is this proof of a dramatic shift?
- Map details dramatic shift from CNN to Fox News over 10-year period
- Does it show the triumph of "fake news" — or, rather, its defeat?
- A closer look at the map's legend allows for more complex analyses
Dramatic and misleading
Image: Reddit / SICResearch
The situation today: CNN pushed back to the edges of the country.
Over the course of no more than a decade, America has radically switched favorites when it comes to cable news networks. As this sequence of maps showing TMAs (Television Market Areas) suggests, CNN is out, Fox News is in.
The maps are certainly dramatic, but also a bit misleading. They nevertheless provide some insight into the state of journalism and the public's attitudes toward the press in the US.
Let's zoom in:
- It's 2008, on the eve of the Obama Era. CNN (blue) dominates the cable news landscape across America. Fox News (red) is an upstart (°1996) with a few regional bastions in the South.
- By 2010, Fox News has broken out of its southern heartland, colonizing markets in the Midwest and the Northwest — and even northern Maine and southern Alaska.
- Two years later, Fox News has lost those two outliers, but has filled up in the middle: it now boasts two large, contiguous blocks in the southeast and northwest, almost touching.
- In 2014, Fox News seems past its prime. The northwestern block has shrunk, the southeastern one has fragmented.
- Energised by Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, Fox News is back with a vengeance. Not only have Maine and Alaska gone from entirely blue to entirely red, so has most of the rest of the U.S. Fox News has plugged the Nebraska Gap: it's no longer possible to walk from coast to coast across CNN territory.
- By 2018, the fortunes from a decade earlier have almost reversed. Fox News rules the roost. CNN clings on to the Pacific Coast, New Mexico, Minnesota and parts of the Northeast — plus a smattering of metropolitan areas in the South and Midwest.
Image source: Reddit / SICResearch
This sequence of maps, showing America turning from blue to red, elicited strong reactions on the Reddit forum where it was published last week. For some, the takeover by Fox News illustrates the demise of all that's good and fair about news journalism. Among the comments?
- "The end is near."
- "The idiocracy grows."
- "(It's) like a spreading disease."
- "One of the more frightening maps I've seen."
- "LOL that's what happens when you're fake news!"
- "CNN went down the toilet on quality."
- "A Minecraft YouTuber could beat CNN's numbers."
- "CNN has become more like a high-school production of a news show."
Not a few find fault with both channels, even if not always to the same degree:
- "That anybody considers either of those networks good news sources is troubling."
- "Both leave you understanding less rather than more."
- "This is what happens when you spout bullsh-- for two years straight. People find an alternative — even if it's just different bullsh--."
- "CNN is sh-- but it's nowhere close to the outright bullsh-- and baseless propaganda Fox News spews."
"Old people learning to Google"
Image: Google Trends
CNN vs. Fox News search terms (200!-2018)
But what do the maps actually show? Created by SICResearch, they do show a huge evolution, but not of both cable news networks' audience size (i.e. Nielsen ratings). The dramatic shift is one in Google search trends. In other words, it shows how often people type in "CNN" or "Fox News" when surfing the web. And that does not necessarily reflect the relative popularity of both networks. As some commenters suggest:
- "I can't remember the last time that I've searched for a news channel on Google. Is it really that difficult for people to type 'cnn.com'?"
- "More than anything else, these maps show smart phone proliferation (among older people) more than anything else."
- "This is a map of how old people and rural areas have learned to use Google in the last decade."
- "This is basically a map of people who don't understand how the internet works, and it's no surprise that it leans conservative."
A visual image as strong as this map sequence looks designed to elicit a vehement response — and its lack of context offers viewers little new information to challenge their preconceptions. Like the news itself, cartography pretends to be objective, but always has an agenda of its own, even if just by the selection of its topics.
The trick is not to despair of maps (or news) but to get a good sense of the parameters that are in play. And, as is often the case (with both maps and news), what's left out is at least as significant as what's actually shown.
One important point: while Fox News is the sole major purveyor of news and opinion with a conservative/right-wing slant, CNN has more competition in the center/left part of the spectrum, notably from MSNBC.
Another: the average age of cable news viewers — whether they watch CNN or Fox News — is in the mid-60s. As a result of a shift in generational habits, TV viewing is down across the board. Younger people are more comfortable with a "cafeteria" approach to their news menu, selecting alternative and online sources for their information.
It should also be noted, however, that Fox News, according to Harvard's Nieman Lab, dominates Facebook when it comes to engagement among news outlets.
CNN, Fox and MSNBC
Image: Google Trends
CNN vs. Fox (without the 'News'; may include searches for actual foxes). See MSNBC (in yellow) for comparison
For the record, here are the Nielsen ratings for average daily viewer total for the three main cable news networks, for 2018 (compared to 2017):
- Fox News: 1,425,000 (-5%)
- MSNBC: 994,000 (+12%)
- CNN: 706,000 (-9%)
And according to this recent overview, the top 50 of the most popular websites in the U.S. includes cnn.com in 28th place, and foxnews.com in... 27th place.The top 5, in descending order, consists of google.com, youtube.com, facebook.com, amazon.com and yahoo.com — the latter being the highest-placed website in the News and Media category.
If you thought your mother was pushy in her pursuit of grandchildren, wait until you learn about bonobo mothers.
- Mother bonobos have been observed to help their sons find and copulate with mates.
- The mothers accomplish this by leading sons to mates, interfering with other males trying to copulate with females, and helping sons rise in the social hierarchy of the group.
- Why do mother bonobos do this? The "grandmother hypothesis" might hold part of the answer.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.