Glenn Beck Licensed By Murdoch

One of the many advantages of You Tube and the social networking sites, is that it is possible to get a real measure of the de-regulated, ‘opinion led’ television the Murdoch clan want to export to Britain from the United States. The Murdochs want an end to the sort of impartiality regulations that have thus far saved us from the delights of Fox TV, and in particular, Murdoch’s hardest hitting current TV evangelical, Glenn Beck. In this, somewhat bizarrely, possibly naively, they apparently have the support of the Director General of the BBC, Mark Thompson.

Beck revels in conspiracy theories. Of late he has been whipping up hysteria over the Egyptian Muslim brotherhood, comparing it to American labor unions – a particular bête noir of Fox TV. He long ago crossed any professional line, by frequently standing in for Sarah Palin and the gloriously miss named Tea Party, whipping up audiences across middle America, and playing to their worst fears and prejudices. According to Andrew Neil in his recent BBC documentary on Palin and the Tea Party, Beck manages to trouser some $30 million a year. Even Murdoch can’t be paying him that much for services rendered, so where does the rest come from? We can only but guess; there are his ranting warm up acts for Palin, his books, his website, currently run by someone who used to manage the Huffington Post and which he may try to flog to AoL, his legendary lachrymose rantings, onion in one hand, handkerchief in the other , which certainly bring in the ratings.

It would be tempting to dismiss much of this as totally bonkers, except that a sizeable number of Americans do hang on Beck’s every word, and as we shall see, sometimes act on them. Of late Beck has been turning his ire on a group of people he believes are primarily responsible for America’s sharp decline.  “These people” raves Beck are responsible for the twentieth century “Era of the big lie”, and for good measure he describes them as the “intelligent minority”, and asks, sneeringly “Just who is the intelligent minority?” Escalating his campaign, he recently exhorted his followers to take a pledge to denounce members of the “intelligent minority” and reject their “violent threats and calls for the destruction of our system – regardless of their underlying ideology – whether they come from the Hutaree Militia or Frances Fox Piven.” On his January 17, 2011 show he called Piven an “enemy of the Constitution” and equated her call for a new social movement to organise the unemployed with “terrorism.”  So who on earth is this woman, this enemy of the people, this terrorist, who is largely responsible for the collapsing of American values?

Step forward Professor Frances Fox Piven, a highly distinguished academic at City University New York (CUNY). I’ve spoken on various platforms in Manhattan with her over the years, but it was only when another academic friend of mine alerted me to the numerous death threats Fox Piven had received following Beck’s rantings that I got in touch with her again. She is now 78 years old and still firing on all scholarly cylinders on behalf of the poor and dispossessed of America.  As an academic she has been able to marshal serious theory and fact throughout her illustrious career, and with her late husband, Richard Cloward played a not inconsiderable role in providing the impetus for progressive voter registration legislation. Somewhere, there still probably exists the classic photo which ran in "Newsweek" during the Columbia University 1968 strike, which shows Fox Piven climbing up a drain pipe in a mini skirt, high heels and pearls, to join students holed up in the Dean's office, occupying the building. 

Beck has repeatedly turned on Fox Piven, and here is where it gets both interesting and disturbing. For until recently anti-Semitism has not been a strong theme in the hate-filled vitriol directed at Piven.  But on his January 14, 2011 show, Beck listed ten people who he said were major contributors to the 20th century “era of the big lie.”  Nine of these people, including Frances Fox Piven (for “sowing the seeds of revolution”) are Jewish, including, George Soros. You can get a flavour of the Beck fulmination by watching this report on MSNBC and see Fox Piven’s response.

Beck’s possible reference point for the Fox Piven conspiracy appears to be an article which she and her husband wrote in the 1960s. Here is a taste of what may be found circulating on Right wing websites – this one titled “New Weimar Republic” and posted by someone called ‘Joy’, which may well be firing Beck and his friends into a puce fury;  “A pair of rad­i­cal Colum­bia Uni­ver­sity pro­fes­sors by the name of Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven wrote an arti­cle in the rad­i­cal mag­a­zine known as The Nation. The arti­cle was pub­lished on May 2, 1966 and laid out what is now known as the ‘Cloward-Piven Strat­egy’. The plan calls for the destruc­tion of cap­i­tal­ism in Amer­ica by swelling the wel­fare rolls to the point of col­laps­ing our econ­omy and then imple­ment­ing social­ism by nation­al­iz­ing many pri­vate insti­tu­tions. Cloward and Piven stud­ied Saul Alin­sky just like Hillary Clin­ton and … Obama” (Quoted from It should be quite evi­dent why ever since the “Great Soci­ety” speech given by Lyn­don John­son, this nation has sunk deeper and deeper into social­ism, which is noth­ing but a euphemism for Marx­ism. These early state­ments, and the fact that this nation has obvi­ously fol­lowed this path laid out by so many Jews, makes it no coin­ci­dence why we have done so.”

Beck’s attacks on Fox Piven have, she believes, led to a substantial increase in the hate mail, some including death threats, she has received. Most are too ghastly to reprise, but here is a moderated selection;

Big Toe

Posted on January 2, 2011 at 11:50am

Another Idiot here who needs to be Euthanized!


Posted on December 31, 2010 at 6:17pm

Oh…ahhh Ms. Piven….Here is what YOU and yours are up against….YOU asked for it…here it comes…be very careful what you ask for honey…you may get exactly that…


I believe that when the laws of this great nation fail its own citizens, and all the voting and talking has been done…“We the People” have a very serious choice to make…I for one believe our fore fathers would expect nothing less!As I mentioned in previous posts…ONE SHOT…ONE KILL!“We The People” will need to stand up for what is right…a few well placed marksmen with high powered rifles…then there would not be any violence…those spineless evil people will not show their faces in the light of day again! (hummm…sounds a little like the terrorist attack the Eric Holder and Obama told Americans we could withstand)


Posted on December 31, 2010 at 4:54pm

I would not be upset at all if she got hit by a car sliding in the snow during a winter storm…. yeah, i wouldn’t be upset at all, i don’t even consider her human


Posted on December 31, 2010 at 5:21pm

Hey Frances. Please get sick and die quickly!


Posted on December 31, 2010 at 5:57pm

that old woman is nothing more than bile coming from a rabid animal. put it out of its misery.

America is not the way she and her Obama followers WANT it to be. WE are stronger than they are, WE surround them.


Posted on December 31, 2010 at 6:00pm

I say bring it. 90 million legal gun owners with over 220 million legal firearms, MOST in the hands of people who claim to be center RIGHT. I think it’s time to reduce the surplus population of leeches, lay abouts, left wing nut jobs, the main stream media, liberal politicians and MOST defense attorneys…

I asked Frances Fox Piven what her reaction was to the death threats that have followed in the wake of the Beck ravings;

“It's tempting I think to be amused by the strange stories that Glenn Beck creates on his chalkboard.  But the stories gain traction with people who are made anxious by the large changes that have overtaken the United States, including the election of a black president and the increasing racial diversity of the population, deindustrialization and the decline of American power abroad, and cultural changes in sexual and family norms.  By telling simple and paranoid fairy tales that trace these big and complex changes to the machinations of particular people, Beck makes the changes comprehensible in a way, and also makes the people who are presumably responsible the targets of his listeners' frustration and outrage. 

This is dangerous for democratic politics, partly because it is utterly irrational, and partly because it is an effort to extort silence from leading voices on the Left.”

Her last line says it all. It is in essence what the Murdoch Empire is all about; monopoly, control, dumbing down and a collapsing of voices and forces that refuse to surrender to them. Rupert and son James know exactly what they are doing, for they, like Professor Frances Fox Piven who still is one, once called themselves “Socialists”. For the deluded souls who seem to believe that the Murdoch clan is interested solely in money, and not politics, think again. Beck gets away with what he does on Murdoch’s dollars.

But Glenn Beck is in a league of his own. When people like him are able to whip up the lumpen white dispossessed, and potentially drive at least some of them to potentially reach for their guns – as happened recently in Tucson, Arizona with deadly effect - they pose a very real threat to public safety. Is this really the sort of television we could also end up with here?

Many Americans, including many Republican Americans of my acquaintance, scratch their heads and ask; what is becoming of public discourse in our country? Why is it so full of hate? The answer lies with people like Glenn Beck, a ghastly, fool of a propagandist whom Rupert Murdoch is happy to employ on his news channel.

Related Articles

Major study: Drug overdoses over a 38-year period reveal hidden trends

It's just the current cycle that involves opiates, but methamphetamine, cocaine, and others have caused the trajectory of overdoses to head the same direction

From the study:
Surprising Science
  • It appears that overdoses are increasing exponentially, no matter the drug itself
  • If the study bears out, it means that even reducing opiates will not slow the trajectory.
  • The causes of these trends remain obscure, but near the end of the write-up about the study, a hint might be apparent
Keep reading Show less

Why "nuclear pasta" is the strongest material in the universe

Through computationally intensive computer simulations, researchers have discovered that "nuclear pasta," found in the crusts of neutron stars, is the strongest material in the universe.

Accretion disk surrounding a neutron star. Credit: NASA
Surprising Science
  • The strongest material in the universe may be the whimsically named "nuclear pasta."
  • You can find this substance in the crust of neutron stars.
  • This amazing material is super-dense, and is 10 billion times harder to break than steel.

Superman is known as the "Man of Steel" for his strength and indestructibility. But the discovery of a new material that's 10 billion times harder to break than steel begs the question—is it time for a new superhero known as "Nuclear Pasta"? That's the name of the substance that a team of researchers thinks is the strongest known material in the universe.

Unlike humans, when stars reach a certain age, they do not just wither and die, but they explode, collapsing into a mass of neurons. The resulting space entity, known as a neutron star, is incredibly dense. So much so that previous research showed that the surface of a such a star would feature amazingly strong material. The new research, which involved the largest-ever computer simulations of a neutron star's crust, proposes that "nuclear pasta," the material just under the surface, is actually stronger.

The competition between forces from protons and neutrons inside a neutron star create super-dense shapes that look like long cylinders or flat planes, referred to as "spaghetti" and "lasagna," respectively. That's also where we get the overall name of nuclear pasta.

Caplan & Horowitz/arXiv

Diagrams illustrating the different types of so-called nuclear pasta.

The researchers' computer simulations needed 2 million hours of processor time before completion, which would be, according to a press release from McGill University, "the equivalent of 250 years on a laptop with a single good GPU." Fortunately, the researchers had access to a supercomputer, although it still took a couple of years. The scientists' simulations consisted of stretching and deforming the nuclear pasta to see how it behaved and what it would take to break it.

While they were able to discover just how strong nuclear pasta seems to be, no one is holding their breath that we'll be sending out missions to mine this substance any time soon. Instead, the discovery has other significant applications.

One of the study's co-authors, Matthew Caplan, a postdoctoral research fellow at McGill University, said the neutron stars would be "a hundred trillion times denser than anything on earth." Understanding what's inside them would be valuable for astronomers because now only the outer layer of such starts can be observed.

"A lot of interesting physics is going on here under extreme conditions and so understanding the physical properties of a neutron star is a way for scientists to test their theories and models," Caplan added. "With this result, many problems need to be revisited. How large a mountain can you build on a neutron star before the crust breaks and it collapses? What will it look like? And most importantly, how can astronomers observe it?"

Another possibility worth studying is that, due to its instability, nuclear pasta might generate gravitational waves. It may be possible to observe them at some point here on Earth by utilizing very sensitive equipment.

The team of scientists also included A. S. Schneider from California Institute of Technology and C. J. Horowitz from Indiana University.

Check out the study "The elasticity of nuclear pasta," published in Physical Review Letters.

How a huge, underwater wall could save melting Antarctic glaciers

Scientists think constructing a miles-long wall along an ice shelf in Antarctica could help protect the world's largest glacier from melting.

Image: NASA
Surprising Science
  • Rising ocean levels are a serious threat to coastal regions around the globe.
  • Scientists have proposed large-scale geoengineering projects that would prevent ice shelves from melting.
  • The most successful solution proposed would be a miles-long, incredibly tall underwater wall at the edge of the ice shelves.

The world's oceans will rise significantly over the next century if the massive ice shelves connected to Antarctica begin to fail as a result of global warming.

To prevent or hold off such a catastrophe, a team of scientists recently proposed a radical plan: build underwater walls that would either support the ice or protect it from warm waters.

In a paper published in The Cryosphere, Michael Wolovick and John Moore from Princeton and the Beijing Normal University, respectively, outlined several "targeted geoengineering" solutions that could help prevent the melting of western Antarctica's Florida-sized Thwaites Glacier, whose melting waters are projected to be the largest source of sea-level rise in the foreseeable future.

An "unthinkable" engineering project

"If [glacial geoengineering] works there then we would expect it to work on less challenging glaciers as well," the authors wrote in the study.

One approach involves using sand or gravel to build artificial mounds on the seafloor that would help support the glacier and hopefully allow it to regrow. In another strategy, an underwater wall would be built to prevent warm waters from eating away at the glacier's base.

The most effective design, according to the team's computer simulations, would be a miles-long and very tall wall, or "artificial sill," that serves as a "continuous barrier" across the length of the glacier, providing it both physical support and protection from warm waters. Although the study authors suggested this option is currently beyond any engineering feat humans have attempted, it was shown to be the most effective solution in preventing the glacier from collapsing.

Source: Wolovick et al.

An example of the proposed geoengineering project. By blocking off the warm water that would otherwise eat away at the glacier's base, further sea level rise might be preventable.

But other, more feasible options could also be effective. For example, building a smaller wall that blocks about 50% of warm water from reaching the glacier would have about a 70% chance of preventing a runaway collapse, while constructing a series of isolated, 1,000-foot-tall columns on the seafloor as supports had about a 30% chance of success.

Still, the authors note that the frigid waters of the Antarctica present unprecedently challenging conditions for such an ambitious geoengineering project. They were also sure to caution that their encouraging results shouldn't be seen as reasons to neglect other measures that would cut global emissions or otherwise combat climate change.

"There are dishonest elements of society that will try to use our research to argue against the necessity of emissions' reductions. Our research does not in any way support that interpretation," they wrote.

"The more carbon we emit, the less likely it becomes that the ice sheets will survive in the long term at anything close to their present volume."

A 2015 report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine illustrates the potentially devastating effects of ice-shelf melting in western Antarctica.

"As the oceans and atmosphere warm, melting of ice shelves in key areas around the edges of the Antarctic ice sheet could trigger a runaway collapse process known as Marine Ice Sheet Instability. If this were to occur, the collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) could potentially contribute 2 to 4 meters (6.5 to 13 feet) of global sea level rise within just a few centuries."