Yoga as a Political Tool

Over the last half-century we’ve emphasized physicality over philosophy. Yet a growing contingent of yogis has been asking questions such as: How can we take these ethical, philosophical and moral codes and apply them to our times? 

In one of his many humorous asides on Real Time earlier this year, Bill Maher got into a discussion about Eastern spirituality and made the claim, ‘Yoga is just stretching.’ While talking about the many connotations often attached to yoga in our culture, his assessment, as much as it made me laugh, is historically untrue. ‘Stretching’ is something that overtook yoga only a century ago, first as a strengthening and toning regimen as part of a new wave of Indian nationalism, and shortly thereafter on American shores in our cultural glorification of the body.

While I’m all for celebrating our bodies (much in yoga’s roots consider them toxic baggage), one piece of traditional yoga ideology is being reconsidered: the yamas and niyamas. Historically one would not be allowed to study if these ethical rules of conduct were not adhered to. If you weren’t practicing these social and personal codes—not stealing, not participating in violence, speaking and acting truthfully, reflecting on your inner nature, and so forth—you were not considered prepared for the deeper experiences of sense withdrawal and meditation. 

Over the last half-century we’ve emphasized physicality over philosophy. Yet a growing contingent of yogis has been asking questions such as: What is yoga’s relevance in today’s world? How can we take these ethical, philosophical and moral codes and apply them to our times? What can we learn from, and what do we discard?  

Recent books by Mark Singleton, Matthew Remski, Julian Walker, and Carol Horton and Roseanne Harvey challenge cultural notions of yoga’s place in modern society. Yoga culture at large has often been lazily clumped into the recent upswell of positive thinking running rampant in New Age circles—the idea that our thoughts can influence reality from a distance, vis-à-vis contemporary sympathetic magic. While Barbara Ehrenreich has succinctly deconstructed the possibility of such wishful thinking, yoga is touted as a panacea for a wide range of physical and emotional ailments, while from the outside it remains a lingering hippie knock-off from a forgotten counter-culture.

Don’t misinterpret that. As a teacher, I know well the therapeutic value of yoga. I use the philosophical and physical components in what I hope makes me a more compassionate, humane and understanding person. I would also argue that yoga can be a valuable tool in an arena in which it currently has very little connection to: politics. And I am not alone in this regard.

According to Yoga Journal’s latest study, there are currently 20 million Americans practicing yoga. While this number represents a people of diverse political and spiritual beliefs, that such a vast array of practitioners come together in a similar space is telling. I am not insinuating they all enjoy the same thing; with so many styles of yoga available, there is hardly one consensus on what yoga ‘is.’ As the Romanian scholar of religions Mircea Eliade wrote,

If the word “yoga” means many things, that is because Yoga is many things.

The notion that yoga is just something you do inside of a studio or gym is, however, dissipating. Experienced yogis already know the value of a meditation/sense withdrawal/breath-focused practice. What I’m suggesting, and what I’m seeing more of in a burgeoning community, is that the values and morals of yoga affect national policy. 

A popular sentiment one of my former teachers would express: How we do anything is how we do everything. Separating our spiritual discipline from our everyday lives means we’re not taking our practice seriously. Although we might not have a biological imperative to treat strangers as closely as kin, compassion and empathy are valuable allies in developing a more human- and nature-conscious world—tools that a devoted yoga practice helps cultivate.

When you take care of yourself, you generally take better care of others. By extension, you become more cognizant of how you treat the world and other people who inhabit it. This leads to shifts in policy, which is why yoga’s moral principles can be translated to an entire nation. 

Recent calls for stripping religion of its metaphysics and employing its ethics has been voiced by a range of thinkers, from the Dalai Lama to Sam Harris. We need to strip yoga of its transcendental roots as well. I’m not calling for an end of its mythologies—the Ramayana is a beautiful tale (though with an unfortunate patriarchal bent), and the Mahabharata is the greatest war story ever told, no sleight to Homer. But yoga, as described by Patanjali, describes the development of siddhis, such as turning your body into a diamond, becoming infinitely small, and levitation. This, along with a misunderstanding of polytheism, is why Americans translate yoga as ‘strange’ or even heretical.

What we can use is the ten major restraints and observances of yoga: 

  • Nonviolence
  • Truthfulness
  • Non-stealing
  • Not being greedy
  • Displaying sexual integrity
  • Cleanliness
  • Contentment
  • Dedication
  • Self-study
  • Austerity 
  • There is no clear-cut road to policy from these. Social agreements are relative and must be weighed in light of the time and culture you inhabit. Some current policy shifts we can address in America:

  • Is telling a woman what to do with her own body in everyone’s best interest? 
  • Does filling every school with armed security guards cause less violence?
  • Can we afford to let executive bankers destroy our economy without being prosecuted? 
  • Yoga as a belief system is useless, as any religion focused solely on beliefs is. Action matters. Policy shifts are part of an action that can affect positive change for the greatest number of Americans. Cultivating a more humane and conscious citizenry that respects all forms of life and the world we live within is a direction yoga points towards. We just need more yogis to take that knowledge off the mat and into office.

    Image: Steven Blandin/

    Got a question for a real NASA astronomer? Ask it here!

    NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller is coming back to Big Think to answer YOUR questions! Here's all you need to know to submit your science-related inquiries.


    Big Think's amazing audience has responded so well to our videos from NASA astronomer and Assistant Director for Science Communication Michelle Thaller that we couldn't wait to bring her back for more!

    And this time, she's ready to tackle any questions you're willing to throw at her, like, "How big is the Universe?", "Am I really made of stars?" or, "How long until Elon Musk starts a colony on Mars?"

    All you have to do is submit your questions to the form below, and we'll use them for an upcoming Q+A session with Michelle. You know what to do, Big Thinkers!

    Keep reading Show less

    Why eating ice cream is linked to shark attacks

    Why are soda and ice cream each linked to violence? This article delivers the final word on what people mean by "correlation does not imply causation."

    • Ice cream consumption is actually linked to shark attacks.
    • But the relationship is correlative, not causal.
    • It's pretty stunning how media outlets skip over this important detail.
    Keep reading Show less
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • The tongue-in-cheek petition, whose stated aim is to reduce the national debt, has been signed more than 8,600 times as of Tuesday.
    • Selling Montana, the fourth largest state in the country, would constitute the largest land deal since the Louisiana Purchase.
    • The national debt is often a source of concern for individuals, but the chances of the U.S. defaulting on its debts are relatively low — in part because the bulk of the national debt is owned by the American public.
    Keep reading Show less

    The answer to Skynet? A democratically controlled supermind.

    The plan to stop megacorps from owning superintelligence is already underway.

    • A.I. technology is often developed within the proprietary silos of big tech companies. What if there was an open, decentralized hub for A.I. developers to share their creations? Enter SingularityNET.
    • The many A.I.s in the network could compete with each other to provide services for users but they could also cooperate, giving way to an emergent-level mind: artificial general intelligence.
    • SingularityNET is powered by blockchain technology, meaning whatever 'digital organism' emerges will not be owned or controlled by any one person, company or government.
    Keep reading Show less