Why Did the Religious Vote for Trump?

Donald Trump directly contradicts the biblical notion of charity. Yet Evangelicals, Mormons, Protestants, and White Catholics overwhelmingly voted for him.

While topics like climate change were painfully absent from this presidential debate cycle, the absence of religion was a welcome change from previous years. And yet, given how essential and absolute issues like abortion, school prayer, and creationism have proven to be in the past, how did religious voters choose their candidate?

Many groups decided to throw religious fervor out the door. If charity and forgiveness are at the heart of Christian doctrine, a whole swath of Evangelicals, Protestants, and White Catholics ignored it when casting their ballot for Donald Trump. Even Mormons, previously touted as fighting Trump’s racist, misogynistic, and xenophobic comments, ended up choosing him 61 to 25 percent over Clinton.

Even though so-called single-issue voters rarely vote based on one issue, once an assumption is made it is hard to overturn. White born-again Christians generally believe in the literal truth of the Bible, the atonement of Jesus Christ, and the idea that America is a Christian nation. Yet Trump’s gaffe stating “Two Corinthians” at Liberty University played out like much of his campaign: haha, oh, that’s just Donald.

This is the same group of fundamentalists, by the way, that built and visit the Creation Museum, an institution that rejects archeology, linguistics, and evolutionary biology, and is actively trying to instill the deceivingly named ‘creation science’ into public school curriculums. (Yes, some evangelicals are in the Christian left, but they are a minority.)

Evangelicalism grew from the Protestant movement, a group that voted for Trump over Clinton by a margin of 58 to 39 percent. Pew does not list the breakdown of groups within Protestantism outside of Evangelicals, so getting into the weeds about exact beliefs is difficult. Interestingly, however, sixteenth-century Protestants were early advocates for religious freedom. Protestants led the charge in democracy, separation of powers, and the separation of church and state.

Trump represents none of those things. He steamrolled through an election making promises that would require a dictator, not a president. He’s hinted at silencing the press. His recent sentiments regarding the possibility of overturning Roe v. Wade sides with one of the most contentious church-state separations in modern America. Although in a few short months Trump can potentially overturn decades of supposed Protestant values, nearly six out of ten faithful cast their ballot for him.

Catholics were much closer, 52 percent to Clinton’s 45 percent. Yet when broken down by ethnicity, 60 percent of White Catholics chose trump (37 percent for Clinton), while 67 percent of Hispanic Catholics voted for Clinton, with only 26 percent of that contingent going for Trump.

Catholics have had quite an awakening under Pope Francis, however. In a recent interview with a communist newspaper in Italy, the pope said,

It has been said many times and my response has always been that, if anything, it is the communists who think like Christians. Christ spoke of a society where the poor, the weak and the marginalized have the right to decide. Not demagogues, not Barabbas, but the people, the poor, whether they have faith in a transcendent God or not. It is they who must help to achieve equality and freedom.

If aligning with communism in a capitalist nation is not enough to swallow, Francis also discussed Trump during the interview. He expressed his concern with the welfare of immigrants and refugees around the world regardless of religious affiliation. When asked about the President-elect, Francis responded,

I do not pass judgment on people and politicians, I simply want to understand the suffering that their approach causes the poor and excluded.

Put another way, closing your doors to those in need is not the most charitable act. Trump’s rhetoric about kicking out immigrants, barring religious groups, and closing the door to refugees are in direct contradiction to what a leader like the pope would hope for. But those are also the main issues voters checked next to his name for. Overwhelmingly, White Catholics did not care about such topics, which leaves us to wonder, what role does religion really play?

Pew points out that the electorate largely remained the same: Evangelicals and Protestants voting Republican, the Jewish and religiously unaffiliated Democratic. Pollsters did note that Catholicism dropped 3 percent, with the religiously unaffiliated claiming three points. Correlation does not imply causation—not all atheists were once Catholic—but the general trend shows that regardless of what candidates say or do, it’s not easy to leave your party.

It is surprising, from a doctrinal perspective, that political affiliation overrules spiritual belief. This forces us to confront a starker reality: religion is fluid and conforms to the tribe, which is opposite of how religion is usually advertised, as a pre-existing condition. If that were truly the case, Evangelicals, Protestants, Mormons, and Catholics would have never voted for the most uncharitable candidate in modern times. Voters might claim religious affiliation, but in an election like this the numbers paint an entirely opposite picture. 


Derek Beres is working on his new book, Whole Motion: Training Your Brain and Body For Optimal Health (Carrel/Skyhorse, Spring 2017). He is based in Los Angeles. Stay in touch on Facebook and Twitter.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

4 reasons Martin Luther King, Jr. fought for universal basic income

In his final years, Martin Luther King, Jr. become increasingly focused on the problem of poverty in America.

(Photo by J. Wilds/Keystone/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Despite being widely known for his leadership role in the American civil rights movement, Martin Luther King, Jr. also played a central role in organizing the Poor People's Campaign of 1968.
  • The campaign was one of the first to demand a guaranteed income for all poor families in America.
  • Today, the idea of a universal basic income is increasingly popular, and King's arguments in support of the policy still make a good case some 50 years later.
Keep reading Show less

Why avoiding logical fallacies is an everyday superpower

10 of the most sandbagging, red-herring, and effective logical fallacies.

Photo credit: Miguel Henriques on Unsplash
Personal Growth
  • Many an otherwise-worthwhile argument has been derailed by logical fallacies.
  • Sometimes these fallacies are deliberate tricks, and sometimes just bad reasoning.
  • Avoiding these traps makes disgreeing so much better.
Keep reading Show less

Why I wear my life on my skin

For Damien Echols, tattoos are part of his existential armor.

  • In prison Damien Echols was known by his number SK931, not his name, and had his hair sheared off. Stripped of his identity, the only thing he had left was his skin.
  • This is why he began tattooing things that are meaningful to him — to carry a "suit of armor" made up the images of the people and objects that have significance to him, from his friends to talismans.
  • Echols believes that all places are imbued with divinity: "If you interact with New York City as if there's an intelligence behind... then it will behave towards you the same way."
Keep reading Show less