Why Christianity has been pushed underground in China

The Chinese government just banned the online sale of Bibles, yet another attempt at President Xi's suppression of Christianity.

During the week, I collect articles on my browser to be read later. “Later” often implies Saturday, when I have more time to sift through pieces I’m interested in catching up on. Neither of the two I just read inspire much hope about free speech.

First, there’s this piece on autocratic leaders pushing Hungary and Poland away from democracy. Being that 75 percent of my heritage derives from these two countries, I’ve followed the rise of Viktor Orban and Jaroslaw Kazcynski over the last few years. The latest news is not inspiring. A succinct summation:

"“Hungary First” is Orban’s election slogan. His relentless anti-immigrant campaign, including claims from a cabinet minister that migrants and refugees would force Hungarians to eat insects, has produced a startling level of fear. Csaba Toth, a political scientist, told me that “children in kindergarten have drawn Soros as the devil and migrants as evil figures who will take you away if you are not good.”

Poland is not in better shape. In both cases, free speech is restricted, and becoming more so, which leads to the second article, this one much closer to home: the Department of Homeland Security is now creating a database of journalists.

The United States government, traditionally one of the bastions of press freedom, is about to compile a list of professional journalists and "top media influencers," which would seem to include bloggers and podcasters, and monitor what they’re putting out to the public.

The problem with becoming too comfortable with how your society functions is that others have vested interests in exploiting your comfort. By the time you’ve realized what’s been lost it’s too late. This is the America we’re currently occupying, pretending it isn't happening day after day.

A Chinese Catholic deacon holds a Bible at the Palm Sunday Mass during the Easter Holy Week at an 'underground' or 'unofficial' church on April 9, 2017 near Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. (Photo by Kevin Frayer/Getty Images)

Unlike America—at least unlike what America has professed itself to be—China makes no pretensions about free speech, especially when it comes to religion. Whereas in America certain religions influence legislation to an uncomfortable degree, Chinese officials are operating in the opposite manner. While the battle between the Communist Party and Christianity is quite old, the nation recently took another step towards suppression by banning the online sale of Bibles.

In an effort to promote “traditional values,” the Chinese government has actively been promoting Buddhism and Taoism, as well as folk religions, while clamping down on the spread of Christianity and Islam. This has forced many Christian churches to go underground. While the Times cites the nation as boasting 38 million Protestants and six million Catholics, the data are hard to accurately assess considering the unwillingness of some members to claim their faith.

In fact, other data count up to 115 million Protestants, with a prediction that by 2030 the nation could have a total of 247 million Christians. Including Catholics, that would make Christianity the nation’s most popular religion—a reality President Xi’s administration is fighting against.

Indoctrination becomes a tool when outright suppression isn’t feasible. Preachers have been told to include Communist Party propaganda in their sermons. With a recent law prohibiting unauthorized religious gatherings, handcuffing churches by denying them the ability to collect donations, offer religious ideas online, or instruct children, Xi is attempting to control the religious ideology of nearly 1.4 billion people. Anyone hoping to push back against this initiative will have a long road to religious freedom under this “president for life.” 

Xi is advocating against “overseas infiltrations” from foreign religions, expressing a long-held communist belief that Christianity will undermine the party’s agenda. This is all happening as the government is, ironically, ending a 70-year stand-off with the Vatican. Church leaders, eager to make inroads in China, were criticized for asking bishops to step aside to allow the installation of two state-appointed leaders—one who was excommunicated by the Vatican years ago. 

That’s not the only shady move by the government. In 2014 it began demolishing churches for suspect reasons, such as improper building permits. Churches across the Zhejiang Province were ordered to remove their crosses. Rather than agree to these terms, preachers went underground out of fear of further retribution.

A Chinese Catholic worshippers wait to take communion at the Palm Sunday Mass during the Easter Holy Week at an 'underground' or 'unofficial' church on April 9, 2017 near Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. (Photo by Kevin Frayer/Getty Images)

The Vatican views this dialogue as a sign that better communication might lie ahead. But the track record is not there. Recall, the Chinese government installed its own Panchen Lama as Tibet’s next spiritual leader—the Dalai Lama’s appointment, which represents the mandated succession, was kidnapped by the Chinese government within three days of being named in 1995. Hopes that Xi will budge on Christianity seem futile.

While I’m no fan of many lessons religion offers—at least when it comes to metaphysical ideas—I’ve argued that children (and adults) should be instructed in more religion, not less. Indoctrinating children is one thing; educating them on the diverse religious ideas of the world equips the youth (and people of any age) to grapple with their own spiritual identity while learning to be tolerant of others. You can’t believe your idea is the best if you have no clue what the competition entails. You also can't argue that faith isn't helpful just because it doesn't help you. 

Which is what China is attempting with the suppression of Christianity and Islam. Robbing people of their spiritual values is no way to lead. Given all we know from history, it’s shocking that these leaders don’t recognize that such restrictions never end well. Yet here we can turn to religion for guidance: power corrupts, and the most powerful become stains on the very history they’re praying to be adored for.


Stay in touch with Derek on Facebook and Twitter.

Trusting your instincts is lazy: Poker pro Liv Boeree on Big Think Edge

International poker champion Liv Boeree teaches decision-making for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to make decisions with the clarity of a World Series Poker Champion.
  • Liv Boeree teaches analytical thinking for Big Think Edge.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less

Are you an overbuyer or an underbuyer?

One way to limit clutter is by being mindful of your spending.

  • Overbuyers are people who love to buy — they stockpile things as a result. These are individuals who are prone to run out of space in trying to store their stuff and they may even lose track of what — and how much of what — they have.
  • One way overbuyers can limit their waste, both money and space wise, is by storing items at the store, and then buy them when they really need them.
  • Underbuyers tend to go to extraordinary lengths to not buy things. They save money and do fewer errands, however, they often make do with shabby personal items. They may also, when they finally decide to go out to buy a product, go without entirely because the item may no longer be available.

Philosopher Alan Watts: 'Why modern education is a hoax'

Explore a legendary philosopher's take on how society fails to prepare us for education and progress.

Alan Watts.
Personal Growth
  • Alan Watts was an instrumental figure in the 1960s counterculture revolution.
  • He believed that we put too much of a focus on intangible goals for our educational and professional careers.
  • Watts believed that the whole educational enterprise is a farce compared to how we should be truly living our lives.
Keep reading Show less

A new study has investigated who watched the ISIS beheading videos, why, and what effect it had on them

This is the first study to explore not only what percentage of people in the general population choose to watch videos of graphic real-life violence, but also why.

Mind & Brain

In the summer of 2014, two videos were released that shocked the world. They showed the beheadings, by ISIS, of two American journalists – first, James Foley and then Steven Sotloff. Though the videos were widely discussed on TV, print and online news, most outlets did not show the full footage. However, it was not difficult to find links to the videos online.

Keep reading Show less