What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Making Assumptions

July 22, 2012, 2:00 AM
Altruism

I've been thinking a lot this week about assumptions.  Especially when it comes to trying to study bold, complicated and human constructs like love, empathy and creativity in the brain.

It started a few weeks ago.  I was talking with a neuroscientist about various brain states linked to the creative process.  He told me simply, "This is a place where we would benefit from asking more concrete questions."

Later, when our conversation moved on to my background, DIRTY MINDS and the research I highlighted into the neuroscience of love and sex, I quipped, "This is another place where scientists might benefit from asking more concrete questions." 

Let me explain.  I don't say this to discount any of the fantastic research done so far.  We all have to start somewhere--and many of the studies into these complex topics are both elegant and thought-provoking.  But even if we ignore the whole notion of what a brain scan can really tell us and whether fMRI set-ups provide any ecological validity, there remains an assumption--a rather big assumption--that these paradigms are actually measuring the things we think they are measuring.  We have to take a leap of faith that looking at a photo of your partner constitutes "love," that asking someone to riff a bit on a piece of music amounts to "creativity."

Take a study that was flying around the Internet this week on altruism.  Headlines proclaimed things like, "Brain Scientists Locate Home of Altruism." Even the press release for the actual study said that they were first to discover a link between brain anatomy and altruistic behavior.

In the study itself, researchers Ernst Fehr and Yosuke Morishima asked participants to divide money between themselves and an anonymous other person.  They suggest that if the person was willing to sacrifice some of that money for the other person, they were acting altruistically. While it is interesting to note that some people always share money (and others never do), and that is linked to more gray matter, is divvying up a few Euros really the practice of "unselfish concern for or devotion to the welfare of others?" And then, in the context of that assumption, can we really say that the brain differences observed show us the neural substrates of something as complicated as altruism?

Like creativity and love, altruism has been something that has been studied extensively using softer, social science measures in the past.  Many of the conclusions drawn from those studies have stuck with us, become a sort of "truth," and now color how scientists design today's neurobiological and neuroimaging studies.  So the more I read about the seats of love, lust, altruism, empathy and the like, I think of my initial conversation with that neuroscientist and wonder what we might find if we were a little less ambitious and focused on more concrete questions.

What do you think? 

Credit:  jangstudio/Shutterstock.com

 

Making Assumptions

Newsletter: Share: