Well the government of Sudan is perpetrating these atrocities obviously. Everyone around the world who values peace, and respect freedoms, and human rights cries out for these atrocities to stop immediately. The people of Sudan have already been fighting against this government oppression. The rebel movements have resisted the government’s oppression and they’re slowing working their way toward peace, which I think they’re mainly going to achieve on their own. And it’s not going to be much that the west can do to accelerate peace in Darfur and the rest of Sudan, including South Sudan which has already achieved a peace agreement; but it’s fairly fragile at the moment that’s something that the people of South Sudan and North Sudan have to continue to work very hard on – maintaining that fragile peace agreement, and then holding their own governments accountable for respecting their freedoms, and respecting their human rights, respecting freedom of speech, freedom of the press, so that they can hold their governments accountable. They can call them to account for war crimes or atrocities. Well I’m certainly in favor of humanitarian aid to help the refugees from Darfur that are in desperate straights. I think it’s a no brainer. I can’t see who could be against that. But we’re gonna have to be humble once again as what we can do from the outside. We can’t figure out other people’s problems for them. The realities on the ground in Darfur are a lot more complex than the way they’re portrayed in the western media. And some westerner who goes in with the media stereotypes of who the good guys are and who the bad guys are, are more likely make things worse. Things are a lot more complex than that. There are a mixture of good guys and bad guys on each side, and you have to sort of let them sort it out by themselves. Recorded On: 7/6/07
Discuss
Michael Kevane on January 11, 2008, 7:31 PM
"Let them sort it out for themselves." Hmmm. Surely Dr. Easterly can come up with a more nuanced moral principle for determining how to intervene in situations where violence characterizes what is being sorted out. How about, "Learn enough about the situation, especially the scale, urgency, and often implicit nature of the violence, to be able to make informed judgments, and then act in a public forum, through reasoned discourse, to convince your fellow citizens to encourage your shared legitimate representatives to take appropriate measures to all of us to inhabit a world of peace." But I guess "Let them sort it out for themselves." is BigThink. For shame.
Michael Kevane
Michael Kevane on January 12, 2008, 12:31 AM
“Let them sort it out for themselves.” Hmmm. Surely Dr. Easterly can come up with a more nuanced moral principle for determining how to intervene in situations where violence characterizes what is being sorted out. How about, “Learn enough about the situation, especially the scale, urgency, and often implicit nature of the violence, to be able to make informed judgments, and then act in a public forum, through reasoned discourse, to convince your fellow citizens to encourage your shared legitimate representatives to take appropriate measures to all of us to inhabit a world of peace.” But I guess “Let them sort it out for themselves.” is BigThink. For shame.
Michael Kevane
David Fridland on January 17, 2008, 1:09 PM
Divestment and investment. Take money from the aggressors and pump money into the rebels.
-D
David Fridland on January 17, 2008, 6:09 PM
Divestment and investment. Take money from the aggressors and pump money into the rebels.
-D
jessica stallone on January 18, 2008, 2:19 PM
What we can do is pressure China to reduce or eliminate oil trade with Sudan.
jessica stallone on January 18, 2008, 7:19 PM
What we can do is pressure China to reduce or eliminate oil trade with Sudan.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register