What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Unanswered Questions

May 10, 2012, 11:20 AM
New%20design%206

Despite all the leaks that have come out over the latest underwear bomb plot there is still a great deal we don't know.

For instance, did information from the undercover asset lead to the strike on Qusa?  Sometimes even the same journalist doesn't know whether it did or did not lead to Qusa's death.  In this piece Paul Cruickshank of CNN claims it is unlikely since the asset never met with Qusa - and yet in this piece Cruickshank suggests that in fact information from the asset did lead to Qusa's death.

I, for one, am confused. 

I am not pointing all this out to pick on Cruickshank but rather to illustrate the pitfalls of trying to put together a comprehensive story when we only knew a few facts, many of which are changing on an hourly basis.

With that in mind I thought it would be helpful if I put together a list of questions that I am still puzzling over as we try to make sense of this latest plot.

1. What will the fallout from the leak be for the Saudi diplomat that AQAP currently holds?  - For weeks AQAP has held the Saudi deputy consul from Aden.  Despite reports that his release imminent he is still being held in Abyan or Shabwa. 

2. Was Fahd al-Qusa's "martyr" bio written before or after the news of the intelligence operation was made public?  Last night Qusa's obit was posted to Islamist forums.  The piece is a fascinating tease but short of real details.  However, the last line threatens more attacks are at hand.  If the piece was written before AQAP knew its latest plot had failed that is one thing, if it was written after that is something else.

3.  Will AQAP unveil the identity of the undercover agent?  Undoubtedly, AQAP recorded a marytrdom video of the undercover agent before giving him the bomb.  The US and Saudis won't divulge his identity for obvious reasons, but will AQAP?  And if the group does what will this tell us about its thought process?

4.  Who is the undercover agent?  What we know about AQAP suggests that he was likely someone who either had a US visa or would have been able to get one easily as I suggest in this story from NPR yesterday (although NPR insists on misspelling my name.)  This would rule out a Yemeni.  Much of the reporting has suggested that the asset was a Saudi, but I have my doubts about this as well.

5.  Are there more bombs out there?  This is an unknown that many have already speculated on as is the follow-up question: How many other bombers has Ibrahim Asiri trained and how unique is Asiri?

6,  Were Saudi intel and the CIA the only two agencies involved in this operation?  Most of the reporting has assumed this to be the case, but it is just that: an assumption.

Those are a few of the questions I am wrestling with - I'm sure there are many others, but these are the one for the moment.  I'll leave you with an interview I did yesterday about the plot with PRI's The World.

 

Unanswered Questions

Newsletter: Share: