What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

More Guantanamo

April 1, 2009, 9:30 AM
Ginny Hill has written a couple of articles over the past few days on Yemen and Guantanamo and al-Qaeda and failed states. The first is at Open Democracy and provides a good overview of some of the challenges that face not only closing down Guantanmo but also Yemen in general.

Hill writes about the possibility of sending some Yemenis to Saudi. I continue to believe and argue to all that will listen that this is a bad idea. In my view - and I know my view differs from a number of people - Saudi Arabia's program is not a solution. Hill writes: "Saudi Arabia put its own returnees through a well-resourced and closely supervised re-education scheme, but cash-strapped Yemen's failure to reassure the US that it could offer similar facilities has created today's bottleneck at Guantánamo."

I don't think the program is a closely supervised as many have been led to believe, and just because Saudi has a much better PR program than Yemen (it is not hard) does not mean that it has a firm understanding of what it is doing. Read for instance, Ibrahim al-Rubaysh, a former Guantanamo detainee, in the current issue of Sada al-Malahim. All is not quite as the Saudis say in public.

Also, I think it is worth while to speculate on what exactly made Muhammad al-'Awfi give himself up. Now if one is of the opinion that he was captured or that he was working as a Saudi plant (trust me, I've heard numerous variants of both) then this line of thinking is not productive. But if one thinks there might be a possibility that the Saudis pressured him to give himself up, while at the same time using President Salih to pressure the tribes to give him up, then, the question to ask is: What did the Saudis pressure him with?

I'm also concerned with rumors I'm hearing about what is going to happen in Yemen during this coming month. Things haven't been good this past month but, in my opinion, the month to come will be worse on a number of fronts.

Hill's second article is at the Guardian in its Comment is Free section. In this article, she lays much of the blame for Yemen's failures at the feet of its foolishly naive policy (or maybe, more accurately, its lack of a policy) when it was on the UN Security Council in 1990.

Many of today's development programs are designed to address problems that stem from the international backlash following Yemen's support for Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait. The cancelled US aid program and loss of remittances from 800,000 Yemeni workers expelled from Saudi Arabia hampered the shaky process of state building that followed the introduction of democracy in 1990.

One quick point here - although I know certain people (such as another contributor to Waq al-waq, who shall remain nameless) disagree - this is exactly the opposite of the argument made by Paul Dresch in A History of Modern Yemen. He writes: "To blame Yemen's subsequent problems on the Gulf War would be easy and largely false." (186)

Also, while I agree that Yemen's situation is particularly acute, it is important to note - as Salih did in his interview with al-Hayat - that people have been writing Yemen's obituary for years, and yet the place keeps on stumbling along.

 

More Guantanamo

Newsletter: Share: