What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

An Early question on AQAP in Sa'dah

November 30, 2010, 4:42 AM
My schedule hasn't really allowed me the time to blog, but I have been thinking about AQAP's statement on the suicide attacks in north Yemen last week.

The statement - at least from my reading - references both attacks (the assumption has been that they were both suicide attacks) and the statement makes clear that at least one of them was and probably both although I think it is ambiguous on this point.

But this brings me to my biggest question about the statement and that is why does it not mention either the identity of the suicide bomber(s) or the date and place of the operation(s). Those three markers are usually standard fare in AQAP's statement of responsibility, so why are they missing this time? I can't think of another statement that claimed credit for a suicide attack that failed to include those three identifying marks, so why are they absent here? The statement, as I read it, is much more general one than it is specific.

There is still much, much more to unpack here - as well as the kidnapping and release of a Saudi doctor. But that will all have to wait for more free time.

An Early question on AQAP i...

Newsletter: Share: