What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Question: Have you ever felt that being a woman is a disadvantage in science?

Bonnie Bassler: I am sure it is so I don’t spend a lot of time thinking about that for myself, and I think at some level I am the wrong person to ask that question to, because here I am, right, you are interviewing me. So for whatever reason, the path that I took, which was by chance, was a path that was open for women, right, and so I had mentors that were gender neutral, my colleagues at Princeton, it is an intellectual bottom line there, women are incredibly successful in our department, our graduate class, our undergraduate class are fifty percent women, right, and so by no sophistication on my part, right, I have been in this field and I feel doublely lucky because I was working on this project that there was no evidence was gaining any traction, and I was a woman, there could have been a very different outcome in an environment that was not as pro science as my department was. And, so, I think that the truth is that women scientists, I don’t know, I don’t want this to come-- when you edit this, I do not want this to be negative, right, like I spent a lot of time thinking that the next generation of women can have it all, but my generation felt that you are choosing between being a good scientist and being a mother. And there are statistics that women have to, however this symmetric is measured, that women scientists have to achieve two-and-a-half times what their male counterparts have to achieve to have the same credibility. And so all of those things are a part of my life, but as we talked, I don’t know how to do anything else, right, so I just muddle through.

Recorded on: 6/17/08

 

 

Women in Science

Newsletter: Share: