What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Question: Who are you?

Adam Bly: Adam Bly. Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Seed. I’m originally from Montreal. I grew up in Canada and spent the first 20-some good years of my life in Canada. And I think both Canada and Montreal specifically provide sort of an interesting perspective. Canadians famously have a kind of love-hate relationship with the United States, and have this kind of neutral, Swiss-like place on the world stage. And so from both perspectives . . . And maybe thirdly because of the emphasis Montreal places on . . . and Quebec places on sort of multilingualism, multiculturalism, I kind of have greater emphasis on social nets and kind of social values – Canada’s universal healthcare system and the prime minister, who I guess I’m most associated with, was Chretien growing up. And so in the last few years of Chretien premiership he . . . leadership, he very much kind of stood up for some sort of distinctly Canadian values that didn’t seem to be entirely American or entirely aligned with the United States and their values. So you know Canada’s identity has always been a subject of kind of fierce debate within Canada – whether there is one or not. Montreal certainly has one, and I think that I sort of naturally gravitate towards the kinds of ideas, aesthetics, qualities that Montreal and Canada espouse. It definitely affects how I look at aesthetics, how I look at the kinds of cities I gravitate to, and the place of cities, and also sort of social issues. You have a unique vantage point looking at the U.S. from a Canadian perspective. We have this, you know, mix of a little bit of aspiring to be like the United States; on the other hand desiring strongly to not be anything like it. And so you get a unique, I think, window through which to view U.S. politics and U.S. issues.

Probably most significantly was a neighbor of mine who I first came to know when I was probably three or four years old. His name was Dr. Cato – Dr. Laslo Cato. And he was a microbiologist. He was a scientist who worked for many, many years . . . I first got to know him when he was in his seventies, so he spent most of his adult life working on leprosy, and working with the WHO and other bodies around the world on global health issues. And I think the things . . . And so I guess I first encountered science with him in our shared backyard. And I would see him planting beets, beans, or bringing this tree that only grew in certain parts of the world for the first time to Canada and train it – naturalize it to the conditions in our . . . you know in our backyard in Montreal. The thing that was significant though was his . . . his emphasis in his own life and in his wife’s life who was a concert pianist. And they had to come to Canada from Europe . . . from Eastern Europe years earlier. The kind of emphasis that they placed on other things in life . . . They were both passionate about science, but she was a concert pianist. He loved classical music. He gardened. She painted. They had beautiful collection of antiques; was as interested in sort of the history of science and the philosophy of science as the practice of science; sort of a technological dimension of science; spoke about world issues in the context of the science. And so my first encounter with a scientist was, in fact, with this truly renaissance-like man who saw science more as a lens through which to view culture as opposed to purely an academic subject matter.

 

Recorded on: 10/17/07

 

 

 

 

Who are you?

Newsletter: Share: