What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Billy Collins: That’s so huge.  Well I think more . . .  I’m not sure about the deep historical view, but I think what’s happening now is tribalism.  It’s . . .  Tribalism seems to be a perversion of faith.  I mean, people say religion is . . .  You can think of religion when you look through the New York Times as being the cause of most of the world’s violent problems these days.  Or not problems, but conflicts.  But I think we mistake religion for tribalism there.  We see that religion; I think it’s something very human about wanting to be better than the people next door, or the people in the next country.  Even like, you know, Mississippi and Alabama can’t stand each other.  And my mother’s family is from a little Island called South ___________.  And right . . . and that’s a Catholic island.  And right next door is a Protestant Island.  I mean they’re both rocks.  They have like five sheep on them, and wind and rain; but they see themselves as very separate rocks.  And obviously one rock thinks it’s better than the other rock.  I don’t know.  

Then if you pour religion into that mindset where you . . . where this . . . this desire for communal superiority to another group, then flames come out of that.  And I think that those are the flames we’re seeing, you know, bursting out around the globe today.Question: What forces have shaped poetry most?

Billy Collins: Well I mean poetry, I think, moves . . . most art moves in a kind of pendulum.  I think poetry . . .  You can see even from the Greeks the argument as to whether literature should be in the common tongue, or should it be in an elevated language?  And this runs . . .  This pendulistic battle goes back and forth.  Wordsworth for instance, to go back to him, wanted to write poetry, as he said, in the speaking language of men the way . . . he wanted to get speech back into it. 

And so did Frost.  And as _____ also the idea of bringing . . . bringing poetry into context with common speech.  And the other . . . the other camp would say that poetry has to be completely different from regular speech, that regular speech is down here and poetry is . . . takes place on another linguistic level.  Those  two voices, or those two opposed positions, I think pretty much throughout the history of English literature at least, have determined these various movements back and forth.  And that would seem to be thanks to a number of poets that came after the high modernism of T.S. Elliot and Ezra Pound.  And you can add Harper and Wallace Stevens.  There’s been a movement back to . . . to the connection between poetry and common speech.  Those big modernists tried to get beyond personality.  They wanted to make something . . . poetry into something more than the expression of the individual personality.  But personality seems to have returned to poetry.




Where are we?

Newsletter: Share: