What is your counsel? | Sam Harris

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Transcript

Question: Collectively, what should we be doing?

Sam Harris: Well I think we … It’s really just a matter of conversation, and releasing these taboos that prevent us from applying pressure to people’s religious beliefs, particularly at the level of politics. You know we had this recent Republican debate where three presidents … or candidates for the presidency of the United States raised their hands to testify that they don’t believe in evolution. And there’s no follow-up question, and there’s no penalty paid by these guys endorsing the starkest ignorance about the state of our knowledge . . . about biology. And then worse than that, the New York TimesNew York Times and the Los Angeles Times that were starkly racist by today’s standards. And we have made real progress in a very short span, and I think we could make the same kind of progress in talking about religion. It’s just, you know, whether we’re likely to do that, I don’t know. publishes a further defense about intelligent design by one of these candidates, Sam Brownback, a week later. This has to change. I mean there has to be a price paid for being . . . You know, if one of the candidates said he thought the earth was flat, that would be synonymous with mental illness in that conte . . . We would just be worried about his health at that point, and his political life essentially would be over. And I think the same kind of . . . There’s a reason why people who are certain that Elvis is still alive don’t get promoted to positions of great power and responsibility in our society. And it’s not like we’ve passed a law against Elvis worship. We haven’t . . . We just cease to take these people seriously. And I think we have to just cease to take people’s religious certainties, metaphysical certainties, certainties about the divine origin of certain books seriously. And that can happen very, very, quickly. And I think we should not be . . . I don’t think we should doubt that a sea change in our discourse is possible, because it clearly is on that . . . Look how racism has undergone a . . . has fallen into disrepute in the last 40 years. Fifty years ago, 60 years ago there were editorials in the

Recorded on: Jul 4 2007