What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: Was 9/11 a declaration of war? Was the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan justified?

Michael Walzer: I think we were justified in going. I thought that was a just war, a war of self-defense, because the people who attacked us in New York in 2001 were not simply a terrorist organization harbored in Afghanistan the way various Palestinian terrorists have office buildings, have offices in Damascus. It wasn’t like that. The Al Qaeda was an active partner of the Taliban regime and they had received from the Taliban regime, the benefits of sovereignty, crucially a territorial base, a place to organize to train, to train their people. And so that was what justified the war, it was the partnership of Taliban and Al-Qaeda that made it just for us to aim at overthrowing the Taliban regime. Where we went wrong--because we obviously did in Afghanistan--was in not committing the resources to political reconstruction that were necessary after the war that we fought and after the war against the Soviet occupation which we funded and supported. After all that we had responsibilities in Afghanistan which we did not fulfill, and we’ve now dragged NATO in--and it is a very good thing I think that NATO has come in--but even with the NATO forces there is not the commitment to political and economic reconstruction in Afghanistan that there should have been.


More from the Big Idea for Monday, September 05 2011


What is a Just War?

Newsletter: Share: