What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: How do you explain the emergent divisions on the right?


Grover Norquist: Well it is a challenge in that it is something that people can focus on. But it has not in 25 years done what some have thought might happen. You say, “Gee. The New York Times back before ’80 said that Reagan is attracting all these people who have jobs and want lower taxes. And all these people go to church and want to be left alone by the secular state. They’re going to fight any minute now.” Well why? What are they going to fight over? In point of fact, there will be many discussions inside of majoritarian movement with 300 million people in the country. If you’re going to deserve the votes of 175 million people, they’re not going to agree on everything. Try and get six people to agree what restaurant to go to for dinner.

So you’re going to have people who disagree on secondary or tertiary issues. But the coalition holds, because even though the guy who’s there and wants to be left alone to practice his faith – if you ask him 20 questions, and you take the guy who wants to be left alone to run his business and you ask them 20 questions, they may have very different answers on questions 7, 8, and 10, but I don’t care. I’m on the board at the National Rifle Association. I can assure you that a lot of people who vote on the Second Amendment have what I consider to be the oddest views on free trade; but they don’t vote on free trade, so on one level I don’t care what they think about free trade.


Topic: Pat Buchanan.


Grover Norquist: Pat Buchanan looked in 2000 and said 70 percent of Republicans think that too many immigrants; 70 percent of Republicans are skeptics on free trade with China. I will run for president as the anti-trade, anti-immigrant candidate and get 70 percent of the vote. What he didn’t ask was not, “What are you willing to talk about on talk radio,” but “What moves your vote?” And in point of fact, there wasn’t a net anti-immigrant, anti-trade vote within the Republican coalition, and he got almost no votes ________ percent of the electorate. So what people are willing to talk about and what they vote on are not the same things necessarily. And so you have to watch and see how people vote. Now you have some guys who are in the coalition and claim to represent large quantities of people.

Pat Robertson would say, “I represent some of the people of faith,” okay? Well he may represent some of them insofar as he says, “We would like to be left alone and not have the state throw prophylactics at our kids at school and not interfere with our ability to transfer our faith.” But if he was to say, “Oh and by the way, I think we should go to San Francisco and _______ gay people,” his voters don’t follow him on that. And they are not willing to cross the street to impose their views on others. I mean if you said, “Do you think everybody should agree with you on everything?” Oh yes, they should. Do you want the state to go make them? If you think everybody would go to heaven better if they were Baptists, are you willing to have the state impose that? There was talk the other day. The head of the Southern Baptist Convention who said, “No, of course not.”

That’s not their view. There are some people who the press will always focus on who have staked out an extreme position, and who fib when they say, “And everybody in my church agrees with me.” Well that’s just not true. You need to be careful about people claiming that they have to have X, Y, and Z to be part of the coalition. The person who is in the coalition because he wants to be left alone to practice his faith and raise his kids is not . . . If you tell him, “Well the state isn’t going to go subsidize your church,” he’s not going to walk out the door and go and join the secular party that does want to interfere with his ability to raise his kid.

There isn’t any there. There’s no alternative political structure to join for somebody who would like to be left alone with their guns, plus they not only want to be left alone. They want gun stamps. You may want gun stamps, but you don’t vote on gun stamps; you vote on being left alone. Would you like 12 other things? Would you like two desserts? Maybe. Okay. Is there some other place to go get two desserts? No. So you are where you are because you want to be left alone. You can ask people all sorts of odd questions and get all sorts of odd answers on a lot of stuff. It doesn’t make it a vote moving issue, although certainly on talk radio, or if you put Jerry Falwell on FOX TV, he can say things that scare people into thinking, “Oh my goodness.

The religious people of faith, they want to do X.” Well I would argue that when you actually look at how the center right coalition movement operates, taxpayers and businessmen don’t want the state to go steal people’s money and give it to them. They want the state to stop stealing their money. People of faith don’t want the state to impose their values. They don’t want their values attacked by the secular state.


Recorded on: September 12, 2007



The Splitting Right

Newsletter: Share: