What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Question: Do you have a personal philosophy?Richard Posner:    I don’t think so.  If I had some of the basic outlook, it would be that people are monkeys with large brains, period.  And that’s the way you have to think about it.  It does make me cynical about human motivation.  And it makes me think, you just have to be very practical, very realistic. 

I don’t put any faith in utopian dreams.  I don’t think people are basically good or anything like that.  You know the promises of politicians and the baloney that judges spew out in their opinions.  I think one wants to have a caustic view of people.  Of all people, not, you have to recognize severe problems of criminality.  We all have problems with abuse of authority, and with mistreatment of all sorts of people, and overextension of criminal law as excessive criminal synthesis.  So the problems are everywhere. 

I very much dislike the extremes of left and right.  And anything that is faith-based – whether it’s religious, or whether it’s the left, they’re just as religious, but they don’t have a god.  But they’re just religious in the sense that it’s based on faith rather than fact.

I think we should always be trying to penetrate to the level of fact.  The criticism of this – of the pragmatic position – is that it’s not enough to know what the facts are and know what the consequences are because they have to be valued. 

There’s a disjunction between “is” and “ought” – that you can’t infer “ought” from “is”.  I agree with that.  But there is a degree of consensus in societies that you actually know the consequences of particular policies.  That most people will be brought to--

There is a basic moral. I don’t like moralistic vocabulary or moralistic reasoning.  But obviously there are people who have moral feelings.  They do react to things.  So if everything was known about abortion – who gets it, why, there are other ways of preventing it, and this and that, and the other thing – if we really understood it, I think we would, most people – not 100 percent, but maybe 60 percent – would think, “Yes, we should deal with the problem.”

 

Recorded on: Nov 21, 2009. 

 

The Personal Philosophy of ...

Newsletter: Share: