Should We Hold Lehman Executives Accountable? | Joseph Stiglitz

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Transcript

Card: Should we hold Lehman executives accountable?

Stiglitz: Clearly, I think they should be held accountable… they probably won’t, least not to a very large extent, you know, it was… in the first bail out of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, I was very critical about that, in part, because they left the management, who have gotten then into the mess, in charge. You know, any system of accountability says if you are so reckless to get us into this mess, how can we trust you to get us out? And you are enriching your pockets, look at the pay that those guys are getting, while they [were leading] their country into these serious problems. Now, things look a little bit better but the difficulty of holding them accountable will not be very easy. That is to say that their bonuses were paid on the basis of the performance in 2006, 2007. There was no provision that said, “You make loss in 2008, 2009, you’ll have to get that… some of that back.” Now, it was a high level of incompetency but from a legal standard, it probably doesn’t rise to the level of fraud that would, at least, in most of the cases and some of them may but to the… that would allow the canceling of their… of their [IB] contracts, canceling their pension benefits. So, in fact, most of these people are going to do very well. Now, they’re going to be crying, let me… you should be clear, they’re going to be crying, they’re going to say, “We would have been so much wealthier had you [bailed] us up… out even better.” You know the [Bernstein’s] people are crying, you know, they’re saying, “Look at what’s happened to our wealth.” I know some people in Citibank who, you know, are saying the same thing. If our stock prices have remained at the inflated level, we would be wealthy… very wealthy, now, we’re only wealthy or put to it more accurately they would have been very, very, very wealthy, now they’re only very, very wealthy. So that point is that, they’re going to walk away with a lot of money. Some of them will not have taken prudential action, would not have put enough money away and there will be some people facing a problem. But we, almost surely, will not hold most of these people accountable for what has happened.