What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Question: How does an Israeli define right-wing versus left-wing? Ronen Bergman:   I wish I knew.  Basically, it had a very strong distinction and it’s nothing about economics.  It’s only about how you treat the issue of whether to give or not give the occupied territories. 

Can we, as Israelis, guarantee or be sure that if we give back the Golan Heights that were taken from Syria during the war of 1967, will Syria comply with the agreement of sustainable peace with Israel? 

Can we trust the Palestinians if we give them back the territories?  For independent Palestinians state, that they would not launch another war, go on another attack against Israel and also the rest of the territory?

But this is the basic question.  And this was the basic distinction between Right and Left.  Right was voting against giving back territories, the Left said we have to compromise otherwise we are going to face a new war with either Syria or the Palestinians or both of them very sooon. 

Nowadays, things have changed because the most right-wing Prime Minister Israel ever had, Ariel Sharon, gave back the Gaza Strip.  Now, basically, he did it just to divert attention from the police inquiries against him in Israel.  So, he did it for irrelevant reasons, but I would say this, the distinction is very, very narrow, and even Benjamin Netanyahu, now the right-wing leader, offered some compensation, some retreats to the Palestinians when he was the Prime Minister. 

But if I were a Palestinian, I would prefer to have either Barak, the leader of the Labor Party, or Tzipi Livni rather than Nathaniel.  Nathaniel comes on the ticket of being a hawkish, anti-Hamas, anti any withdrawal from the territories to power, and he would be elected, if elected, with the voices of the right-wing supporters.  So, he would be reluctant to give up but they always say that things that you see from the Prime Minister’s office, you don’t see it from anywhere else.  So, he would also have to make much, much more retreats and withdrawals than he declares now.

Recorded: Sep 19, 2008

 

Ronen Bergman on the Terms ...

Newsletter: Share: