What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Question: How has Washington changed?

Stephen Carter: I think that our parents’ generation, for whom democracy is under threat – under threat from the Great Depression and under threat from fascism – they used democracy better. They used democracy better. I had lunch a few years ago with a retiring politician who was a very senior politician, and he talked about when he was first coming along in Washington. And he said when he was coming along in the ‘60s, that people could vehemently disagree on the floor of the House of Representatives one day, and that night go out to dinner with each other’s families and have a good time. Because he said they had been through so much together – the war, the Depression and other things – they understood their commonality across their differences. But, he said, for them, this new crowd . . . He said the new crowd – and he meant Democrats and Republicans alike . . . for the new crowd it’s personal. “They generally don’t like each other,” and that was how he put it. And that’s true of a lot of people today; that lacking the commonalities . . . having had luxury, therefore lacking common experiences, lacking a common struggle, it’s very easy for us to decide there’s something wrong with people and disagree with them when we never had to experience our human commonalities.

Recorded on: 7/25/07

 

 

 

 

Re: How has Washington chan...

Newsletter: Share: