What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: What is your biggest critique of the Republican Party?

Peter Beinart: My strongest critique of the Republicans today is that they do not recognize that America . . . when Americans are economically insecure, Americans are less free. The Republican party talks a great deal about individual and personal freedom. They see it as their mission to promote the freedom of Americans. And they believe that the best way for Americans to be as free as possible is for government to be as limited . . . as small as possible; for government to do as little as possible. I think that’s fundamentally wrong. I think that people are most free when government provides certain public goods that people cannot provide for themselves, which in fact then allow them to take advantage of their God-given talents. So if people . . . If we don’t . . . If people don’t have decent healthcare; if we have a broken healthcare system in which many Americans have no healthcare at all, and other Americans are trapped in dead-end jobs and afraid to leave those jobs to go back to school, or to take . . . or to start a business because they fear losing their healthcare, they are in fact less free to actualize the kind of lives that they want to live. If we have a government that ignores the threat of global warming and the possibility . . . the threat it poses to the United States, that infringes on the . . . long-term on the freedom of Americans. And if we have a government that does not take the . . . that puts hacks in critical positions of public authority as the Bush administration did when it came to FEMA, that we find ourselves in a situation in New Orleans in which Americans are radically unfree. The people of New Orleans are literally imprisoned in their city and imprisoned in the Superdome because the government is not providing them the public goods which they can’t provide for themselves, which in fact allow them to be safe and to be free. I think that the Republicans . . . party biggest problem is that they don’t recognize that the deterioration of the American welfare state in a globalized age has actually meant that American . . . not just that Americans are more economically insecure, but that Americans have become less free to act . . . to make of themselves what they will; that freedom paradoxically requires some degree of security; that people who are . . . who are . . . who don’t feel economically secure are people who, in fact, are less free to take risks. If you believe in risk taking as Republicans claim they do, then you have to start rebuilding the American welfare state so Americans have some greater degree of economic security.

Recorded on: 9/12/07







Peter Beinart Exposes the R...

Newsletter: Share: